1. ) SYED SADDIQ BIN SYED ABDUL RAHMAN 2. ) NAJIB BIN ABU NAWAR 3. ) MOHD BAKIRUDIN BIN HAJI ABDULLAH 4. ) MUHAMAD FADZLY BIN BISRI v 1. ) PERDANA MENTERI MALAYSIA 2. ) Kerajaan Malaysia
6 cases cited
(0 SG, 6 foreign)
Catchwords
Administrative Law — Judicial review — Application for leave — First applicant is a Member of Parliament — Application to review putative respondents’ decision not to allocate funds to the applicant’s constituency Administrative Law — Judicial review — Application for leave — Mandamus to compel the putative respondents to channel the funds to the Pusat Khidmat Rakyat Parlimen Muar — Mandamus to compel the putative respondents to approve the allocations applied under myKHAS system Administrative Law — Judicial review — Application for leave — Whether decision sought to be reviewed was based on policy consideration — Whether decision amenable to judicial review — Whether issue of whether decision of putative respondents amenable to judicial review could be decided at leave stage Civil Procedure — Time — Certiorari — Mandamus — Application for judicial review — Date of impugned decision and when made — Whether application for leave made out of time — No application for extension of time made — Rules of Court 2012 — O 53 r 3(6) — O 53 r 3(7)
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Statutes Cited
Federal Constitution
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (6)
MY (6)
[1999] 3 CLJ 65 [2008] 6 MLJ 704 [2013] 2 CLJ 1009 [2013] 4 CLJ 193 [2019] 3 MLJ 443 [2021] 5 MLJ 209
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-25-179-04-2024)