ONG HOCK TEK v DATUK BANDAR KUALA LUMPUR PENCELAH DICADANGKAN KAISAR MAXIM SDN. BHD

wa-25-222-05-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 June 2025 • WA-25-222-05/2024 • 16 min read
16 cases cited (0 SG, 16 foreign)

Catchwords

(1) The Applicant is seeking a stay of the decision made by DBKL (R1) in granting a development order to Kaisar Maxim Sdn Bhd (R2) for a proposed development on a piece of land classified as reserve land for power lines and electricity transmission. (2) Both DBKL and Kaisar Maxim, contested the stay application (L1), arguing that the application has no merits and should be dismissed with costs. (3) I heard this stay application on 17.06.2025 and I find that this application has merit and is allowed with costs in the cause.

Judges (1)

Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz Delivered

Counsel (10)

Rao & Kamal Firm Shukor Baljit & Partners Firm Thomas Phillip Firm Abd Shukor Ahmad Counsel Respondent Daneil Bock JR Wei Counsel Respondent Gayathri Chandrakasan Counsel Respondent Ken Moo Counsel Respondent Phoebe Loi Yean Wei Counsel Applicant See Hau Tsien Counsel Applicant Selwyn Das Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

KAISAR MAXIM Sdn Bhd Proposed Intervener Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur Respondent Ong Hock Tek Applicant

Case Significance

ONG HOCK TEK v DATUK BANDAR KUALA LUMPUR PENCELAH DICADANGKAN KAISAR MAXIM SD... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 16, 2025 (citation: wa-25-222-05-2024). The case was decided by Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz.

What was the outcome of ONG HOCK TEK v DATUK BANDAR KUALA LUMPUR PENCELAH DICADANGKAN KAISAR MAXIM SD...?

ONG HOCK TEK v DATUK BANDAR KUALA LUMPUR PENCELAH DICADANGKAN KAISAR MAXIM SD... is a High Court decision dated June 16, 2025. The case was heard by Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (16)

MY (16)
[1966] 1 MLJ 86 [1979] 1 MLJ 126 [1994] 2 AMR 1427 [1994] 2 CLJ 705 [1994] 2 MLJ 601 [1998] 3 MLJ 289 [2002] 3 MLJ 49 [2003] 1 AMR 352 [2003] 1 CLJ 21 [2003] 5445 MLJ 128 [2004] 1 MLJ 257 [2007] 7 MLJ 13 [2008] 4 AMR 564 [2008] 4 MLJ 620 [2015] 7 MLJ 305 [2021] MLJU 2889

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-25-222-05-2024)