MOHAMAD AZLAN BIN RASDAI v 1. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB IBU PEJABAT KONTINJEN, POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA 2. ) KETUA POLIS DAERAH DANG WANGI

wa-25-589-11-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 6 April 2026 • WA-25-589-11/2022 • 17 min read

8 cases cited (0 SG, 8 foreign)

Catchwords

Judicial review-police officer charged with offence of extortion under section 384 in the Magistrate’s court-arose out of a search conducted on 2 foreigners-disciplinary action taken for 8 offences of insurbordination arising from failure to observe directives of the IGP and administrative directives-disciplinary action also taken for failure to declare subsequent acquisition of property-the Applicant was imposed various punishments including dismissal-challenged contravention of Regulation 30-no action can be taken during pendency of criminal case-whether disciplinary action based on same grounds as criminal offence-whether new grounds not in O.53 Statement can be taken at the judicial review proceedings-whether Disciplinary Authority has a duty to provide documentary evidence considered in finding a prima facie case-whether alternative punishments ought to be considered

Judges (1)

Alice Loke Yee Ching Delivered

Counsel (5)

Purshotaman & Partners Firm Ahmad Ilham bin Haridz Counsel Respondent Mohamad Solehheen bin Mohammad Zaki Counsel Respondent Purshotaman a/l Puvanendran Counsel Applicant Zulkiefli bin Sulaiman Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

KETUA POLIS DAERAH DANG WANGI Respondent LEMBAGA TATATERTIB IBU PEJABAT KONTINJEN, POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA Respondent Mohamad Azlan bin Rasdai Applicant

Statutes Cited

Federal Constitution

Art 5

Penal Code (Cap 574)

Cases Cited (8)

MY (8)

[1981] 1 MLJ 304 [1997] 2 MLJ 361 [1998] 1 MLJ 153 [2008] 1 MLJ 725 [2012] 3 MLJ 149 [2018] 12 MLJ 17 [2019] 7 CLJ 55 [2021] 5 MLJ 857

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-25-589-11-2022)