TANDA BESTARI DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
11 cases cited
(0 SG, 11 foreign)
Catchwords
The Applicant applied for Judicial Review to quash the decision of the Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri (DGIR), alleging it was illegal, void, beyond authority, breached natural justice, was irrational or unreasonable, denied the Applicant’s legitimate expectation, and sought further relief as stated in the application at L.1. On 29.07.2025, after hearing, I find that L1 has merit and OIT for prayer a, b, c, d, e (with variation, a 5% interest is allowed on the returned sum commencing from the date of the filing of this JR), prayer f and g. Parties to bear their own costs.
Judges (1)
Counsel (9)
Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill Firm Ahmad Isyak bin Mohd Hassan Counsel Respondent Azleena binti Md Khairuddin Counsel Respondent Chris Toh Pei Roo Counsel Applicant Dato' Nitin Nadkarni Counsel Applicant Mohamad Asyraf bin Zakaria Counsel Respondent Mohd Harris Bin Hanapi Counsel Respondent Nurfarzana Mohammad Puat Counsel Respondent Soon Jia Ying Counsel Applicant
Statutes Cited
Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
Federal Constitution
Art 13(2)
Income Tax Act 1967 (Cap 53)
Land Acquisition Act 1960 (Cap 486)
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (11)
MY (11)
[1939] 1 MLJ 253 [1980] 2 MLJ 283 [1987] 2 MLJ 311 [2014] 2 MLJ 271 [2015] 3 CLJ 861 [2020] 1 MLJ 281 [2022] 4 MLJ 74 [2023] 5 MLJ 32 [2023] 9 CLJ 557 [2023] MLJU 260 [2024] 5 MLJ 897
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-25-60-03-2023)