Mohamad Sukry bin Tamsuri v 1. ) ACP Ng Siew Hiang 2. ) LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN 3. ) SURUHANJAYA PASUKAN POLIS 4. ) Kerajaan Malaysia

wa-25-611-12-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 26 February 2026 • WA-25-611-12/2022 • 29 min read

21 cases cited (0 SG, 21 foreign)

Catchwords

Whether a serious miscarriage of justice occurred as the Applicant was not provided with the Said Documents - Whether the Applicant should have been afforded an oral hearing

Judges (1)

Aliza binti Sulaiman Delivered

Counsel (4)

M Manoharan & Co. Firm Hariharan Manoharan Counsel Applicant Manoharan Malayalam Counsel Applicant Mohammad Solehheen bin Mohammad Zaki Counsel Respondent

Parties (5)

Kerajaan Malaysia Respondent LEMBAGA TATATERTIB POLIS DIRAJA MALAYSIA BUKIT AMAN Respondent SURUHANJAYA PASUKAN POLIS Respondent Acp Ng Siew Hiang Respondent Mohamad Sukry bin Tamsuri Applicant

Statutes Cited

Federal Constitution

Art 135(2)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (21)

UK (2)

[1948] 1 KB 223 [1985] 1 AC 374

MY (19)

[1974] 1 MLJ 138 [1979] 2 MLJ 276 [1991] 1 MLJ 417 [1995] 1 AMR 855 [1995] 1 MLJ 308 [1997] 1 MLJ 145 [1997] 1 MLJ 789 [1997] 2 CLJ 11 [1998] 1 CLJ 227 [1998] 1 MLJ 153 [2001] 2 MLJ 417 [2004] 2 MLJ 288 [2008] 6 MLJ 1 [2010] 6 MLJ 1 [2012] 3 MLJ 149 [2015] 5 CLJ 1 [2017] 2 CLJ 1 [2018] 6 AMR 321 [2026] MLJU 580

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-25-611-12-2022)