MARIA CHIN BINTI ABDULLAH v 1. ) PEGUAM NEGARA MALAYSIA 2. ) MAJLIS AGAMA ISLAM WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR (MAWIP) 3. ) JABATAN KEHAKIMAN SYARIAH WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR
3 cases cited
(0 SG, 3 foreign)
Catchwords
Administrative Law — Judicial review — Application for —Application for leave to intervene — Rules of Court 2012 (“ROC”) — O 53 r 8 of the ROC — Whether proposed intervener in is a “proper person” with a direct interest — Whether applicant had arguable case — Whether the decision of this Court will prejudice the interest of the proposed intervener vis a vis the Syariah consent order Administrative Law — Judicial review — Application for — Application for leave to intervene — Whether O 15 r 6(2)(b) of the ROC applied to application to intervene in judicial review proceedings — Whether appellant had direct interest to intervene in judicial review proceedings
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (20)
Chambers of Zainul Rijal Firm Nurul Hafidzah & Associates Firm A'in Sakinah Binti Ali Counsel Respondent Akberdin Counsel Intervener Ali Hazaifah Counsel Respondent Amiratul Al Amirat Counsel Applicant Danial Farhan bin Zainul Rijal Counsel Respondent Elani Binti Mazlan Counsel Applicant Imtiyaz Wizni Aufa Othman Counsel Respondent Lisa Yong Counsel Applicant Liyana binti Muhammad Fuad Counsel Respondent Meor Hafiz Counsel Intervener Mohd Rafie Counsel Intervener Mohd Reza Counsel Intervener Puteri Ummo Counsel Intervener Rizal Rafie Counsel Intervener Rosli Dahlan Counsel Applicant Sulaiman Abdullah Counsel Intervener Zainul Rijal Abu Bakar Counsel Respondent Zeti Zulfah Binti Hassan @ Zulkifli Counsel Applicant
Statutes Cited
Federal Constitution
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (3)
MY (3)
[2009] 6 CLJ 405 [2009] 6 MLJ 307 [2012] 1 MLJ 92
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-25-73-03-2021)