1. ) TEOH SZE WEI 2. ) WONG SUT YI v 1. ) QA ADVISORY SDN BHD 2. ) CHUA KEE SEONG 3. ) TAN WENG KHAI

wa-28ncc-1236-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 27 October 2025 • WA-28NCC-1236-12/2024 • 13 min read
3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

Company law - winding up - Just and equitable - Companies Act 2016,s.465(1)(h) - Alleged failure of substratum - Dispute as to nature of company's business - Whether company carried on consultancy services or unlawful procurement services - Whether substratum genuinely failed - Disputed allegations on affidavit evidence - Absence of viva voce evidence or cross-examination - Court confined to undisputed facts - Scope of remedies under s.465 - Whether winding-up petition ought to be dismissed.

Practice Areas

Company law

Judges (1)

Suhendran Sockanathan Delivered

Counsel (5)

Wong Neoh & Partners Firm Y.C. Wong Firm Eric Augustin Counsel Respondent Goh Chin How Counsel Petitioner Mahathir bin Abdullah Counsel Petitioner

Parties (5)

QA ADVISORY Sdn Bhd Respondent Chua Kee Seong Respondent Tan Weng Khai Respondent Teoh Sze Wei Petitioner Wong Sut Yi Petitioner

Case Significance

1. ) TEOH SZE WEI 2. ) WONG SUT YI v 1. ) QA ADVISORY SDN BHD 2. ) CHUA KEE S... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 27, 2025 (citation: wa-28ncc-1236-12-2024). The case was decided by Suhendran Sockanathan.

What was the outcome of 1. ) TEOH SZE WEI 2. ) WONG SUT YI v 1. ) QA ADVISORY SDN BHD 2. ) CHUA KEE S...?

1. ) TEOH SZE WEI 2. ) WONG SUT YI v 1. ) QA ADVISORY SDN BHD 2. ) CHUA KEE S... is a High Court decision dated October 27, 2025. The case was heard by Suhendran Sockanathan. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)
[1987] 1 MLJ 433 [1995] 3 MLJ 598 [2013] 5 MLJ 1

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-28ncc-1236-12-2024)