Concrewall Building System (IBS) SDN. BHD. v Z & Z BINA SDN. BHD. PENCELAH Kontrek Shahdan Sdn Bhd. (in Liquidation)

wa-28ncc-367-04-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 10 March 2025 • WA-28NCC-367-04/2024 • 7 min read

1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Petition to wind-up the Respondent under section 465 and 466 of the Companies Act 2016. Whether irregular service of the Statutory Notice invalidates the Petition despite the Respondent not having suffered any substantial injustice from such irregular service. Whether of section 582(1) and (2) of the Companies Act 2026 can cure such irregularity.

Judges (1)

Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz Delivered

Counsel (5)

Revathi & Partners Firm Vinod Kamalanathan & Associates Firm Darshini Devi Ravindran Counsel Petitioner R Kamalanathan Counsel Respondent Vinod Kamalathan Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

Concrewall Building System Sdn Bhd Petitioner Kontrek Shahdan Sdn Bhd. (in Liquidation) Intervener Z & Z BINA Sdn Bhd Respondent

Case Significance

Concrewall Building System (IBS) SDN. BHD. v Z & Z BINA SDN. BHD. PENCELAH Ko... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 10, 2025 (citation: wa-28ncc-367-04-2024). The case was decided by Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz.

What was the outcome of Concrewall Building System (IBS) SDN. BHD. v Z & Z BINA SDN. BHD. PENCELAH Ko...?

Concrewall Building System (IBS) SDN. BHD. v Z & Z BINA SDN. BHD. PENCELAH Ko... is a High Court decision dated March 10, 2025. The case was heard by Ahmad Murad bin Abdul Aziz. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (1)

MY (1)

[2000] 5 MLJ 708

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-28ncc-367-04-2024)