Ling Sie Kiiong v Naushad Bin Abdul Rahiman PIHAK KETIGA 1. ) Sujad Sha Bin Abdul Rahman 2. ) Arashad Bin Abdul Rahman PIHAK TERKILAN SALIHIN

wa-28pw-268-05-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 29 January 2026 • WA-28PW-268-05/2024 • 11 min read

2 cases cited (0 SG, 2 foreign)

Catchwords

Company law – Winding up – Contempt proceedings - Directors’ duties – Sections 502 and 503 Companies Act 2016 – Obligation to submit statement of affairs and produce company documents – Court orders for attendance and production of documents – Whether directors complied with court orders – Whether failure to attend court and produce documents amounts to contempt of court – Order 52 rule 2 Rules of Court 2012 – Whether deliberate disobedience and defiance of court orders established – Whether partial or non-compliance constitutes contempt – Sentencing for contempt – Principles governing punishment – Whether fines and custodial sentences justified – Distinction between non-attendance and inadequate compliance – Whether conduct hindered liquidator’s recovery of company assets – Protection of court process – Whether disobedience undermines administration of justice

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Suhendran Sockanathan Delivered

Counsel (7)

Ang Chambers Firm R Muthu & Co. Firm Susielan & Assoc. Firm Ang Wei Jun Counsel Respondent M.Robert Counsel Respondent R. Santhi Counsel Applicant R.Pavanjothi Counsel Respondent

Parties (5)

Arashad bin Abdul Rahman Third Party Ling Sie Kiiong Applicant Naushad bin Abdul Rahiman Respondent Salihin Aggrieved Party Sujad Sha bin Abdul Rahman Third Party

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Cases Cited (2)

MY (2)

[2009] 1 CLJ 286 [2012] 8 CLJ 729

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-28pw-268-05-2024)