YONG JING JOO v 1. ) GOLDPAGE ASSET SDN BHD 2. ) ARTHUR LAW HIAN TAT

wa-28pw-554-09-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 March 2025 • WA-28PW-554-09/2024 • 17 min read
10 cases cited (0 SG, 10 foreign)

Catchwords

Company Law-Post Winding Up-Leave Application to commence proceedings against wound up company-Section 471(1) Companies Act 2016-test for leave-prima facie case-remedies sought of declaratory relief and specific performance cannot be granted by winding up Court or by the proof of debt process. Company Law-Post Winding Up-Leave Application to commence proceedings against Liquidator-test for leave-prima facie case-merits to the claim-proof of pecuniary loss

Judges (1)

Suhendran Sockanathan Delivered

Counsel (4)

KH Wong, Chin & Cheah Firm Yap Siew Yee & Co. Firm Kwan Yi Xuan Counsel Applicant Yap Yoon Jan Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

GOLDPAGE ASSET Sdn Bhd Respondent Arthur Law Hian Tat Respondent Yong Jing Joo Applicant

Case Significance

YONG JING JOO v 1. ) GOLDPAGE ASSET SDN BHD 2. ) ARTHUR LAW HIAN TAT is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 25, 2025 (citation: wa-28pw-554-09-2024). The case was decided by Suhendran Sockanathan.

What was the outcome of YONG JING JOO v 1. ) GOLDPAGE ASSET SDN BHD 2. ) ARTHUR LAW HIAN TAT?

YONG JING JOO v 1. ) GOLDPAGE ASSET SDN BHD 2. ) ARTHUR LAW HIAN TAT is a High Court decision dated March 25, 2025. The case was heard by Suhendran Sockanathan. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Companies Act
s 226(3)
Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
s 471(1)
Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (10)

UK (1)
[2001] 1 AC 268
MY (9)
[1994] 1 MLJ 294 [2012] 2 MLJ 713 [2014] 4 MLJ 886 [2017] 6 MLJ 661 [2020] 11 MLJ 212 [2020] 6 MLJ 168 [2021] MLJU 1666 [2023] 5 MLJ 284 [2024] MLJU 2479

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-28pw-554-09-2024)