PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN EWE SAW LEE PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN DATO' SRI ANDREW KAM TAI YEOW

wa-29ncc-45-01-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 12 October 2025 • WA-29NCC-45-01/2024 • 16 min read

5 cases cited (0 SG, 5 foreign)

Catchwords

Bankruptcy-Creditor's petition-Adjournment of hearing-Insolvency Rules 2017,r.19 - Mandatory requirement of service not less than eight clear days before hearing - Application to set aside creditor's petition filed and served at eleventh hour - Whether application in breach of r.19 ought to be ignored - Abuse of process - Tactical interlocutory applications to delay hearing of creditor's petition - Whether Deputy Registrar erred in adjourning petition - Appeal against adjournment - Whether dismissal of application to set aside creditor's petition correct.

Judges (1)

Suhendran Sockanathan Delivered

Counsel (5)

Kenth Partnership Firm Sathya, Lee & Co. Firm Balvinder Singh Counsel Petitioner Ooi Xi Fang Counsel Respondent Rishipal Singh Counsel Petitioner

Parties (2)

Dato' Sri Andrew Kam Tai Yeow Judgment Debtor Ewe Saw Lee Judgment Creditor

Case Significance

PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN EWE SAW LEE PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN DATO' SRI ANDREW KAM... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 12, 2025 (citation: wa-29ncc-45-01-2024). The case was decided by Suhendran Sockanathan.

What was the outcome of PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN EWE SAW LEE PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN DATO' SRI ANDREW KAM...?

PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN EWE SAW LEE PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN DATO' SRI ANDREW KAM... is a High Court decision dated October 12, 2025. The case was heard by Suhendran Sockanathan. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (5)

MY (5)

[1988] 1 MLJ 304 [2001] 4 MLJ 203 [2003] 4 CLJ 34 [2007] 8 MLJ 714 [2012] 4 CLJ 624

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-29ncc-45-01-2024)