R I N v 1. ) M I N 2. ) V I N

wa-33-143-04-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 27 March 2025 • WA-33-143-04/2024 • 7 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

Family law - Application to anonymise parties - Importance of anonymising all parties in matrimonial disputes due to sensitive and private matters - Whether Application to anonymise ought to be disallowed on basis that Children are over 18 years old - Whether Application to anonymise ought to be disallowed in the name public interest - Distinction between public interest and public's interest - Whether Respondent’s position as public servant warranted such refusal of anonymity - Whether refusal to anonymise may hinder prospects of settlement - Courts of Judicature Act 1964 section 15.

Practice Areas

Family law

Judges (1)

Sumathi a/p Murugiah Delivered

Counsel (6)

Wong & Co Firm Emily Wong Li Yan Counsel Respondent Kiran Dhaliwal Counsel Respondent Liza Chan Sow Keng Counsel Respondent YN Foo Counsel Respondent Yu Yi Lin Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

M I N Respondent R I N Petitioner V I N Respondent

Case Significance

R I N v 1. ) M I N 2. ) V I N is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 27, 2025 (citation: wa-33-143-04-2024). The case was decided by Sumathi a/p Murugiah.

What was the outcome of R I N v 1. ) M I N 2. ) V I N?

R I N v 1. ) M I N 2. ) V I N is a High Court decision dated March 27, 2025. The case was heard by Sumathi a/p Murugiah. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)

[1995] 4 CLJ 427 [2003] 7 CLJ 81 [2022] 6 CLJ 586

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-33-143-04-2024)