Thai Kim Sim v 1. ) Tan Bee Geok 2. ) Lin Woon Fui PIHAK YANG DINAMAKAN 1. ) Tan Seah Lee 2. ) Chea Tsui Khung
15 cases cited
(2 SG, 13 foreign)
Catchwords
Family law - Jurisdiction of court - Wife filing winding-up petition of company in Winding-Up Court - Both husband and wife had pleaded in their petitions for judicial separation and divorce respectively the shares of that company as matrimonial assets - Whether Family Court had jurisdiction to prevent wife from winding up company in winding up court - Whether wife had already submitted to jurisdiction of Family Court - Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, section 76 Family law - Company law - Wife filing winding-up petition of company in Winding-Up Court - Both husband and wife had pleaded in their petitions for judicial separation and divorce respectively the shares of that company as matrimonial assets - Whether Fortuna injunction warranted to prevent wife from further proceeding in Winding-Up Court - Purpose of Fortuna Injunction - Whether there was abuse of the process of court - Companies Act 2016, sections 466, 442, 472 Family law - Company law - Wife filing winding-up petition of company in Winding-Up Court - Both husband and wife had pleaded in their petitions for judicial separation and divorce respectively the shares of that company as matrimonial assets - Whether quia time injunction warranted to prevent wife from further dissipating matrimonial assets until final disposal of judicial separation and divorce petition - Specific Relief Act 1950, section 50
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
M A T v 1. ) K A T 2. ) N A T PIHAK YANG DINAMAKAN 1. ) S A T 2. ) H A T is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 25, 2025 (citation: wa-33-160-04-2024). The case was decided by Evrol Mariette Peters.
What was the outcome of M A T v 1. ) K A T 2. ) N A T PIHAK YANG DINAMAKAN 1. ) S A T 2. ) H A T?
M A T v 1. ) K A T 2. ) N A T PIHAK YANG DINAMAKAN 1. ) S A T 2. ) H A T is a High Court decision dated March 25, 2025. The case was heard by Evrol Mariette Peters. See the full judgment for details.
Statutes Cited
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (15)
SG (1)
[2016] SGCA 2
SLR (1)
[2012] 2 SLR 506
UK (1)
[1949] 1 Ch 395
MY (12)
[1987] 1 MLJ 433 [1987] MLRA 68 [1999] 5 CLJ 474 [2000] 6 MLJ 48 [2002] 1 CLJ 721 [2002] 2 MLJ 97 [2003] 4 CLJ 539 [2003] 4 MLJ 770 [2003] 6 AMR 459 [2006] 6 MLJ 179 [2008] 4 MLJ 863 [2011] 6 CLJ 782
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-33-160-04-2024)