H A I v 1. ) P A I 2. ) K A I
Catchwords
Family law - Judicial separation - Wife's claim for spousal maintenance – Whether lump-sum spousal maintenance claim was permissible – Factors to consider when granting lump-sum maintenance - How to calculate lump-sum spousal maintenance - Whether Wife had satisfied the "means and needs" assessment to justify claim for spousal maintenance – Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, sections 77 and 78 Family law - Judicial separation – Cause of breakdown of marriage – Whether Wife had proved adultery between Husband and Co-Respondent – Whether Husband’s claim of erectile dysfunction sufficient to negate adultery – Whether efforts by Husband and Co-Respondent to conceive through IVF corroborated adultery - Whether Wife entitled to claim damages from Co-Respondent upon establishing adultery - Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, sections 53, 54, 58, 59 Family law - Judicial separation – Wife’s claim to division of matrimonial assets - Whether Wife entitled to equal division of matrimonial assets – Whether assets acquired by Husband during marriage were inherited and thus excluded from marital pool - Whether an arrangement existed regarding division of matrimonial assets and the portion the Wife should receive - Whether Court should adopt a feminist approach to the division of assets - Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, section 76
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
H A I v 1. ) P A I 2. ) K A I is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 18, 2026 (citation: wa-33-574-10-2022). The case was decided by Sumathi a/p Murugiah.
What was the outcome of H A I v 1. ) P A I 2. ) K A I?
H A I v 1. ) P A I 2. ) K A I is a High Court decision dated January 18, 2026. The case was heard by Sumathi a/p Murugiah. See the full judgment for details.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-33-574-10-2022)