SINOHYDRO CORPORATION (M) SDN BHD v KAJ DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD
Catchwords
[23] Lastly, this Court also found no merits as to the Defendant’s argument that there was a delay in the application. There is no legal requirement that such execution proceedings must be commenced immediately after having secured the enforcement order. [24] The Defendant was at liberty to address the Ex Parte Show Cause Order dated 29.10.2024 at the hearing fixed for the show cause. Instead, the Defendant opted to apply to set aside the said order, a procedural choice which this Court does not find to be justified on the facts before it. [25] In dismissing the Defendant’s appeal against the SAR’s decision dated 22.8.2025 to dismiss the Defendant’s application to set aside the said SAR’s decision granted on 29.10.2024, this Court granted an order for costs of RM10,000.00 to the Plaintiff.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
SINOHYDRO CORPORATION (M) SDN BHD v KAJ DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 28, 2025 (citation: wa-36-56-10-2024). The case was decided by Roz Mawar binti Rozain.
What was the outcome of SINOHYDRO CORPORATION (M) SDN BHD v KAJ DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD?
SINOHYDRO CORPORATION (M) SDN BHD v KAJ DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated October 28, 2025. The case was heard by Roz Mawar binti Rozain. See the full judgment for details.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-36-56-10-2024)