CRIMINAL LAW: Evidence – Admissibility of recorded telephone conversation – s. 43(3) Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 – Whether written authorisation required for recording made with consent and cooperation of one participant – Whether recording falls within prohibition against interception where only one party to conversation was unaware of recording – Admissibility of document not tendered by prosecution – s. 51A Criminal Procedure Code – Whether s. 51A empowers court to compel prosecution to adduce document disclosed pre-trial but not tendered at trial – Failure to cross-examine on crucial matters – Whether unchallenged evidence must be accepted
7 cases · Part of CRIMINAL LAW: Evidence
ja-42ra-1-02-2025 MYHC
MUHAMMAD AZIM BIN MUHAMAD ADNAN v Pendakwa Raya
8 January 2026
ja-42ra-2-02-2025 MYHC
Mohd Shahir Bin Ahmad Dewi - Dalam Jaminan v Pendakwa Raya
8 January 2026
ja-42ra-3-02-2025 MYHC
MUHAMMAD AZIM BIN MUHAMAD ADNAN v Pendakwa Raya
8 January 2026
ja-42ra-4-02-2025 MYHC
1. ) MOHAMAD ZULHISHAM BIN ZULKAFLI 2. ) MOHAMED SYUKUR BIN GULAM MOHAMED v Pendakwa Raya
8 January 2026
ja-42ra-5-02-2025 MYHC
1. ) MOHAMAD ZULHISHAM BIN ZULKAFLI 2. ) MOHAMED SYUKUR BIN GULAM MOHAMED v Pendakwa Raya
8 January 2026
ja-42ra-6-03-2025 MYHC
MOHD SHAHIR BIN AHMAD DEWI v Pendakwa Raya
8 January 2026
ja-42ra-7-03-2025 MYHC
MOHD SHAHIR BIN AHMAD DEWI v Pendakwa Raya
8 January 2026