Restitution

6 cases · July 2025 to July 2026

Case Volume by Year

3
25
3
26
2025–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Unjust enrichment — Essential elements — Enrichment at plaintiff’s expense — Unjust factor — Absence of defence — Whether registered proprietor enriched by unlawful abstraction of electricity committed by another — Failure to prove enrichment. 1 Unjust enrichment — Discharge of defendant’s indebtedness to third party by plaintiff bank — Benefit received through payment under banker’s guarantee — Whether retention of benefit without reimbursement unjust. 1 Unjust enrichment — Whether repayment of withdrawn sum warranted — Benefit received by claimant — Equitable set-off — Money applied to discharge debt connected with claimant’s asset 1 Unjust enrichment — Failure of consideration Dishonest assistance — Knowing receipt — Constructive trust Illegality — Ex turpi causa — Public policy — In pari delicto Moneylenders Act 1951 — Unlicensed moneylending — Investment or loan Bankruptcy — Undischarged bankrupt — Sanction of Director General of Insolvency — Locus standi Anti–Money Laundering, Anti–Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 — Freezing of bank accounts Burden of proof — Fraud — Standard of proof — Sections 101 and 103 Evidence Act 1950 Clean hands doctrine — Equitable relief — Restitution denied Third party bank accounts — Control of account — Absence of benefit — No unjust enrichment Civil procedure — Claim dismissed — Costs — Allocatur 1 Unjust enrichment — Quantum meruit — Section 71 of the Contracts Act 1950 — Claim for reasonable compensation for services rendered — Where a valid and subsisting contract exists between the Appellant and a third party (AFSB) under which full payment was made, a claim under Section 71 or quantum meruit against a non-contracting party (the Government) is not available. 1 Unjust enrichment — Recovery of construction costs — Abandoned projects — Relevance of Land Ownership in Construction Claims — In a claim for restitution regarding the rehabilitation of property — whether a company in liquidation that is not the registered landowner is a suitable or necessary party to the proceedings. 1

Unjust enrichment — Essential elements — Enrichment at plaintiff’s expense — Unjust factor — Absence of defence — Whether registered proprietor enriched by unlawful abstraction of electricity committed by another — Failure to prove enrichment. 1 case

Unjust enrichment — Discharge of defendant’s indebtedness to third party by plaintiff bank — Benefit received through payment under banker’s guarantee — Whether retention of benefit without reimbursement unjust. 1 case

Unjust enrichment — Whether repayment of withdrawn sum warranted — Benefit received by claimant — Equitable set-off — Money applied to discharge debt connected with claimant’s asset 1 case

Unjust enrichment — Failure of consideration Dishonest assistance — Knowing receipt — Constructive trust Illegality — Ex turpi causa — Public policy — In pari delicto Moneylenders Act 1951 — Unlicensed moneylending — Investment or loan Bankruptcy — Undischarged bankrupt — Sanction of Director General of Insolvency — Locus standi Anti–Money Laundering, Anti–Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 — Freezing of bank accounts Burden of proof — Fraud — Standard of proof — Sections 101 and 103 Evidence Act 1950 Clean hands doctrine — Equitable relief — Restitution denied Third party bank accounts — Control of account — Absence of benefit — No unjust enrichment Civil procedure — Claim dismissed — Costs — Allocatur 1 case

Unjust enrichment — Quantum meruit — Section 71 of the Contracts Act 1950 — Claim for reasonable compensation for services rendered — Where a valid and subsisting contract exists between the Appellant and a third party (AFSB) under which full payment was made, a claim under Section 71 or quantum meruit against a non-contracting party (the Government) is not available. 1 case

Unjust enrichment — Recovery of construction costs — Abandoned projects — Relevance of Land Ownership in Construction Claims — In a claim for restitution regarding the rehabilitation of property — whether a company in liquidation that is not the registered landowner is a suitable or necessary party to the proceedings. 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 1 case
Government Proceedings Act 1956
cited in 1 case
Contract Act 1950
cited in 1 case
Federal Constitution
cited in 1 case
Rules of Court 2012
cited in 1 case
Moneylenders Act 1951
cited in 1 case
Moneylending Act 1951
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Key People & Firms

Cases