Timberbrand Sdn Bhd v PRS Forest Management (M) Sdn Bhd

ba-22ncvc-411-10-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 March 2025 • BA-22NCvC-411-10/2021 • 9 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

Repudiation of contract - Claim for wrongful termination and refund of the sums paid – Counterclaim for damages in loss of future crop production – Time of the essence - Whether time was set at large – Acquiescence - Whether Defendant had wrongfully terminated the contract

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (7)

Adrian & Co. Firm R. Raja Gopal & Co. Firm Adrian a/l Silvarajoo Counsel Defendant Krishnan Nair Counsel Plaintiff Nabihah Aqilah Counsel Plaintiff Nur Amalina binti Mohamad Rosli Counsel Defendant Raja Gopal A/L T Ramasamy Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

PRS Forest Management Sdn Bhd Defendant Timberbrand Sdn Bhd Plaintiff

Case Significance

Timberbrand Sdn Bhd v PRS Forest Management (M) Sdn Bhd is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 23, 2025 (citation: ba-22ncvc-411-10-2021). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.

What was the outcome of Timberbrand Sdn Bhd v PRS Forest Management (M) Sdn Bhd?

Timberbrand Sdn Bhd v PRS Forest Management (M) Sdn Bhd is a High Court decision dated March 23, 2025. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Environmental Quality Act 1974 (Cap 127)

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)

[1969] 1 MLRH 297 [1983] 1 CLJ 178 [2021] 5 CLJ 149

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ba-22ncvc-411-10-2021)