Appeal

46 cases · December 2017 to July 2026

Case Volume by Year

1
17
1
19
1
22
2
23
3
24
18
25
20
26
2017–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Grounds of appeal — Jurisdictional objections — Monetary and territorial limits — Whether fatal — Sessions Court judgment upheld. 3 interpretation of Clause 35A and Section 10 Schedule A — calculation of LAD — when the 42 month period begin for computation of the LAD — interpretation of contract — Court of Appeal already decided in similar cases — stare decisis — Appeal dismissed 3 Bankruptcy — Adjudication — Annulment of Bankruptcy Order — Application under Section 105, Insolvency Act 1967 — Whether non-filing of Statement of Affairs by Judgment Debtors fatal to annulment application — Whether director’s bankruptcy can be annulled upon settlement of Company’s EPF contributions — Section 46, Employees Provident Fund Act 1991 — Whether failure to satisfy Proofs of Debt filed before and after the annulment application affects the application. — Right of Judgment Creditor. 2 Tort — Trespass to land — Unregistered lease — Rights of the occupier of land against that of the registered proprietor — Whether there is an Agreement to Lease — Successor in title question — Whether management corporation is bound by the Agreement to Lease entered by Developer with third party — Whether this action is time-barred 2 First appeal after full trial — Scope of appellate intervention — “Plainly wrong” standard — Inference from primary facts — Failure to appreciate material evidence — Burden of proof — Whether findings of trial court unsupported by evidence — Whether appellate court entitled to interfere. 1 First appeal — Appellate jurisdiction — Findings of fact — Standard of appellate intervention — Judicial appreciation of evidence — Whether trial judge plainly wrong — Misapprehension of evidence — Misdirection of law — Evidence Act 1950, ss 101–103, 114(g). Contract — Building repair contract — Roofing and waterproofing works — Scope of contractual obligations — Whether contracted works completed — Burden of proof — External wall defect — Whether defect within contractual scope — Subsequent agreement for additional works — Formation of contract — Commercial quotations — Performance of contractual obligations. Contract — Refund undertaking — Written acknowledgment of debt — WhatsApp communications — Evidential value of electronic communications — Personal undertaking — Personal liability — Agency — Authority to bind sole proprietorship — Actual authority — Ostensible authority — Separate legal personality — Contracts Act 1950, s 15 — Coercion — Whether police report and demand letter constituted coercion — Whether undertaking vitiated by coercion. Damages — Loss of rental — Causation — Proof of loss — Quantum — Duty to mitigate loss — Inspection charges — General damages. Evidence — Contemporaneous documents — WhatsApp messages — Written undertaking — Oral evidence — Documentary evidence — Adverse inference — Failure to produce evidence — Section 114(g), Evidence Act 1950. Practice and Procedure — Appeal from Sessions Court — Partial allowance of appeal — Variation of judgment — Interest — Costs. 1 Findings of fact — Interference by appellate court — Whether trial judge plainly wrong — Failure of judicial appreciation of evidence — Principles governing appellate review. Civil Procedure — Appeal — New point raised on appeal — Admissibility of evidence not challenged at trial — Whether appellant precluded from raising issue for first time on appeal. Civil Procedure — Written submissions — Late filing — Whether written submissions should be struck out — Effect of non-compliance with court directions — Exercise of judicial discretion — Order 1A and Order 2 r 1(2) Rules of Court 2012. Contract — Formation — Contract by conduct — Commercial services — No written agreement — Invoices issued and received — Whether proposal, acceptance and consideration established — Contracts Act 1950, s 2. Contract — Privity — Proper contracting party — Dealings through representative — Whether respondent proper party to sue. Evidence — Burden of proof — Evidential burden — Proof of contractual relationship — Invoices bearing recipient’s company chop — Internal memoranda — Part payment — Whether sufficient to establish liability — Evidence Act 1950, s 101. Evidence — Documentary evidence — Invoices — Delivery and receipt — Unsigned invoices — Weight of evidence — Absence of ancillary service records — Whether claim proved on balance of probabilities. Evidence — Quantum — Proof of indebtedness — Missing invoice from bundle — Admission in cross-examination — Internal acknowledgment of debt — Subsequent part payment — Whether quantum established. Practice and Procedure — Costs — Award by trial court — Appellate interference — Principles governing exercise of discretion. 1 Findings of fact — Appellate intervention — Judgment delivered by successor judge who did not hear witnesses — Whether appellate court in as good a position to evaluate documentary evidence — Plainly wrong test — Judicial appreciation of evidence. 1 Findings of fact — Whether trial court erred in treating signed documents as conclusive proof of loan — Deficiencies in reasoning — Whether appellate court entitled to affirm decision where result independently supportable on evidence. 1 Findings of fact — Appellate intervention — Whether trial judge guilty of insufficient judicial appreciation of evidence — Whether findings supported by documentary evidence and contemporaneous records — Principles governing appellate restraint. 1 Appellate intervention — Question of law — Statutory interpretation — Whether learned Magistrate misdirected herself in interpreting sections 33A and 35 of the Insolvency Act 1967 — Appeal allowed. 1 Findings of fact — Appellate intervention — Whether trial judge plainly wrong — Deference to findings based on credibility and contemporaneous documents — Scope of appellate review 1 Finality — Court of Appeal dismissal — Whether appellate dismissal reinforced operation of res judicata and Henderson principle where plaintiff had expressly raised alleged blacklisting issue in memorandum of appeal 1 Appellate intervention — Exercise of discretion by Sessions Court — Whether appellate court should interfere with discretionary order striking out pleading — No error of principle or appealable error established. 1 Findings of fact — Principles governing appellate interference — “Plainly wrong” test — Lee Ing Chin v Gan Yook Chin — Ng Hoo Kui & Anor v Wendy Tan Lee Peng & Ors — P’ng Hun Sun v Dato’ Yip Yee Foo — Whether findings on deposit claim sustainable 1 Quantum of damages — Appellate interference — Scope of appellate review — Findings of fact and assessment of damages by trial court — Whether trial judge acted on wrong principles of law or misapprehended evidence — Whether award manifestly inadequate or plainly erroneous — Whether appellate court entitled to substitute its own assessment merely because a different figure could reasonably have been awarded 1 Contracts — Sale and management agreements — Aquilaria/Agarwood trees — Beneficial ownership — Misrepresentation — Fraud — Corporate veil — Personal liability of director — Winding up of company before delivery of judgment — Section 471 Companies Act 2016 — Retrospective or nunc pro tunc leave — Whether absence of leave rendered judgment void — Whether judgment after full trial should be maintained — Appeal dismissed. 1 Findings of fact — Principles governing appellate intervention — Whether trial judge misdirected himself on facts or law — Whether findings plainly wrong or against weight of evidence — Deference to trial court’s assessment of witnesses and evidence. 1 Findings of fact — Appellate restraint — Whether appellate intervention justified where trial court misdirected itself in law — Whether there was insufficient judicial appreciation of evidence Company law — Separate legal entity — Company distinct from directors and shareholders — Personal liability of directors — Whether directors may be personally liable for acts relating to company financing — Whether corporate veil may be lifted absent pleaded and proved sham, façade or fraud — Companies Act 2016, ss 20, 21 Contract — Fraud — Fraudulent misrepresentation — Whether representations shown to be false when made — Whether subsequent failure of business venture sufficient to prove fraudulent intent at inception — Contracts Act 1950, s 17 Contract — Undue influence — Family relationship — Sibling relationship — Whether trust and confidence between siblings sufficient to establish domination of will — Whether actual or presumed undue influence proved — Contracts Act 1950, s 16 Evidence — Adverse inference — Failure to call material witness — Failure to produce supporting documents — Whether adverse inference under s 114(g) of the Evidence Act 1950 can substitute proof of essential ingredients of fraud Damages — Special damages — Strict proof — Loss of opportunity — Future profits — Rejected financing application — Whether claimed losses too remote, contingent or speculative — Whether exemplary damages sustainable absent proof of fraud Guarantee — Guarantor — MARA financing — Alleged representations inducing respondent to become guarantor — Whether liability properly imposed personally on appellants. 1 Extension of time — Delay of 35 days — Factors to be considered — Length of delay, reasons, prospects of success, prejudice — Emotional distress and financial constraint — Whether sufficient explanation — Prospect of appeal bound to fail — Extension refused. 1 + 21 more

Bankruptcy — Adjudication — Annulment of Bankruptcy Order — Application under Section 105, Insolvency Act 1967 — Whether non-filing of Statement of Affairs by Judgment Debtors fatal to annulment application — Whether director’s bankruptcy can be annulled upon settlement of Company’s EPF contributions — Section 46, Employees Provident Fund Act 1991 — Whether failure to satisfy Proofs of Debt filed before and after the annulment application affects the application. — Right of Judgment Creditor. 2 cases

j-03im-53-07-2023 Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja v HAI KIONG NIANG PIHAK KETIGA Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia
10 July 2025
j-03im-57-08-2023 Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja v HAI CHIA LING
10 July 2025

Tort — Trespass to land — Unregistered lease — Rights of the occupier of land against that of the registered proprietor — Whether there is an Agreement to Lease — Successor in title question — Whether management corporation is bound by the Agreement to Lease entered by Developer with third party — Whether this action is time-barred 2 cases

ba-12b-65-06-2024 SERAI SAUJANA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v 1. ) SERAI SAUJANA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) MANAGEMENT CORPORATION OF THE VILLA @ SERAI SAUJANA 3. ) TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD
12 May 2025
ba-12b-75-07-2024 TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD v 1. ) Serai Saujana Development Sdn Bhd 2. ) SAUJANA RESORT (M) BERHAD
12 May 2025

First appeal after full trial — Scope of appellate intervention — “Plainly wrong” standard — Inference from primary facts — Failure to appreciate material evidence — Burden of proof — Whether findings of trial court unsupported by evidence — Whether appellate court entitled to interfere. 1 case

ma-12bncvc-1-02-2026 LIM KEEM KOK & SONS REALTY SDN. BHD. v TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD
8 July 2026

Findings of fact — Interference by appellate court — Whether trial judge plainly wrong — Failure of judicial appreciation of evidence — Principles governing appellate review. Civil Procedure — Appeal — New point raised on appeal — Admissibility of evidence not challenged at trial — Whether appellant precluded from raising issue for first time on appeal. Civil Procedure — Written submissions — Late filing — Whether written submissions should be struck out — Effect of non-compliance with court directions — Exercise of judicial discretion — Order 1A and Order 2 r 1(2) Rules of Court 2012. Contract — Formation — Contract by conduct — Commercial services — No written agreement — Invoices issued and received — Whether proposal, acceptance and consideration established — Contracts Act 1950, s 2. Contract — Privity — Proper contracting party — Dealings through representative — Whether respondent proper party to sue. Evidence — Burden of proof — Evidential burden — Proof of contractual relationship — Invoices bearing recipient’s company chop — Internal memoranda — Part payment — Whether sufficient to establish liability — Evidence Act 1950, s 101. Evidence — Documentary evidence — Invoices — Delivery and receipt — Unsigned invoices — Weight of evidence — Absence of ancillary service records — Whether claim proved on balance of probabilities. Evidence — Quantum — Proof of indebtedness — Missing invoice from bundle — Admission in cross-examination — Internal acknowledgment of debt — Subsequent part payment — Whether quantum established. Practice and Procedure — Costs — Award by trial court — Appellate interference — Principles governing exercise of discretion. 1 case

ma-12bncvc-9-12-2025 ALM HOSPITALITY SDN BHD v BEST SUN TECH ENGINEERING SDN BHD
24 June 2026

Findings of fact — Appellate intervention — Judgment delivered by successor judge who did not hear witnesses — Whether appellate court in as good a position to evaluate documentary evidence — Plainly wrong test — Judicial appreciation of evidence. 1 case

ma-12bncc-1-01-2026 NG SOO SUAN v DANIEL TAN SOO LEONG
18 June 2026

Findings of fact — Whether trial court erred in treating signed documents as conclusive proof of loan — Deficiencies in reasoning — Whether appellate court entitled to affirm decision where result independently supportable on evidence. 1 case

ma-12bncc-1-01-2026 NG SOO SUAN v DANIEL TAN SOO LEONG
18 June 2026

Findings of fact — Appellate intervention — Whether trial judge guilty of insufficient judicial appreciation of evidence — Whether findings supported by documentary evidence and contemporaneous records — Principles governing appellate restraint. 1 case

ma-12gs-1-10-2025 1. ) SURIA MEKAR SDN. BHD. 2. ) MOHD YAAKOP BIN MOHD DAUD 3. ) NOR FARIZAN BINTI MOHD DAUD v Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia (KDRM)
17 June 2026

Appellate intervention — Question of law — Statutory interpretation — Whether learned Magistrate misdirected herself in interpreting sections 33A and 35 of the Insolvency Act 1967 — Appeal allowed. 1 case

wa-11ancvc-53-11-2025 MISC BERHAD (dahulunya dikenali sebagai Malaysia International Shipping Corporation Berhad) v SYAHRIDZ BIN DZULKEFLI
4 June 2026

Findings of fact — Appellate intervention — Whether trial judge plainly wrong — Deference to findings based on credibility and contemporaneous documents — Scope of appellate review 1 case

ma-12bncvc-11-12-2025 SAMUDERA WIBAWA SDN BHD v PRUDENCE ENERGY SDN BHD
20 May 2026

Finality — Court of Appeal dismissal — Whether appellate dismissal reinforced operation of res judicata and Henderson principle where plaintiff had expressly raised alleged blacklisting issue in memorandum of appeal 1 case

ma-22ncc-9-05-2024 BAHARUDIN BIN ABDUL LATIP v 1. ) PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD 2. ) PRUDENTIAL BSN TAKAFUL BERHAD
20 May 2026

Appellate intervention — Exercise of discretion by Sessions Court — Whether appellate court should interfere with discretionary order striking out pleading — No error of principle or appealable error established. 1 case

wa-12ancvc-163-11-2025 Komala Naidu a/p Purushothaman v KANAGARAJ NAIDU A/L PURUSHOTHAMAN
13 May 2026

Findings of fact — Principles governing appellate interference — “Plainly wrong” test — Lee Ing Chin v Gan Yook Chin — Ng Hoo Kui & Anor v Wendy Tan Lee Peng & Ors — P’ng Hun Sun v Dato’ Yip Yee Foo — Whether findings on deposit claim sustainable 1 case

wa-12bncvc-133-11-2025 PROVEN RELIANCE MANAGEMENT SDN. BHD. v Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM)
11 May 2026

Quantum of damages — Appellate interference — Scope of appellate review — Findings of fact and assessment of damages by trial court — Whether trial judge acted on wrong principles of law or misapprehended evidence — Whether award manifestly inadequate or plainly erroneous — Whether appellate court entitled to substitute its own assessment merely because a different figure could reasonably have been awarded 1 case

ja-12b-37-06-2025 1. ) RAJINA A/P WILLIAM adalah isteri yang sah kepada THANABAL A/L THANGARAJOO simati dan membawa tindakan ini untuk dirinya dan juga bagi pihak estate simati di bawah Seksyen 7 & 8 Akta Undang-Undang Sibil 1956 dan juga bagi gantirugi berifmen 2. ) XXXX v WANG KANG WEI
20 April 2026

Contracts — Sale and management agreements — Aquilaria/Agarwood trees — Beneficial ownership — Misrepresentation — Fraud — Corporate veil — Personal liability of director — Winding up of company before delivery of judgment — Section 471 Companies Act 2016 — Retrospective or nunc pro tunc leave — Whether absence of leave rendered judgment void — Whether judgment after full trial should be maintained — Appeal dismissed. 1 case

ba-12bncvc-62-10-2024 1. ) FORESTRY ASSETS SDN. BHD. 2. ) ESHMAEL RAO SOOSAY DASS v 1. ) ROSMA AIDA BINTI RAMELI 2. ) LEE CHIH CHIANG
8 April 2026

Findings of fact — Principles governing appellate intervention — Whether trial judge misdirected himself on facts or law — Whether findings plainly wrong or against weight of evidence — Deference to trial court’s assessment of witnesses and evidence. 1 case

ba-12b-7-01-2024 MOHAMMAD FIRDAUS BIN AHMAD HUSSIN v SHANMUGAM A/L KANDASAMY
9 March 2026

Extension of time — Delay of 35 days — Factors to be considered — Length of delay, reasons, prospects of success, prejudice — Emotional distress and financial constraint — Whether sufficient explanation — Prospect of appeal bound to fail — Extension refused. 1 case

wa-24ncvc-5126-10-2025 BANURI BIN SIMOK v CHIN MUN FUN
4 March 2026

Appellate intervention — Principles — Trial judge's findings of fact — Whether plainly wrong or lacking judicial appreciation of evidence — UEM Group Bhd v Genisys Integrated Engineers Pte Ltd & Anor [2010] 9 CLJ 785 (FC) followed 1 case

ta-12bncvc-3-06-2025 MANAF BIN BEDO v LADANG RAKYAT TRENGGANU SDN BHD
27 January 2026

Cross-appeal — Finding of negligence by lower court — Failure to file notice of appeal — Whether respondent entitled to challenge findings of fact — Finality of litigation 1 case

wa-11bncvc-26-06-2025 BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA TAMAN BELIMBING PERDANA v SANI-MAP DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD
7 January 2026

O14 and O18 — application for summary judgment pursuant to Order 14 of the ROC and an application for striking out under Order 18 Rule 19 involve two different sets of principles, tests and burdens of proof. The facts of the case may be similar, as may the issues arising — I am of the opinion that consideration in an application for summary judgment is different from an application to strike out under O18. Therefore, the SCJ's reason, at paragraph 13 of his GOJ, is a misdirection of the law — appeal allowed. 1 case

ba-12ancvc-59-11-2024 ARMANEE CONDOMINIUM JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY v BURGESS RAWSON MANAGEMENT SDN BHD
21 August 2025

Whether the Appellant had raised arguable and substantive issues regarding the non-compliance with the HP Act, section 4 1(b)(ii) and section 5(1) and whether the Appellant is entitled to reimbursement of the payment made under a void contract — section 4(1)(a) is applicable in this relationship between Appellant and Respondent, as the Appellant had signed the written statement in Part I of the Second Schedule as required under section 4(1)(a) of the HP Act — Appeal dismissed. 1 case

ba-12ancc-25-11-2024 PAUL RAJ A/L DAVIS v MERCEDES-BENZ SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.
18 August 2025

Prosecution’s appeal against sentence — Appellate restraint — No basis for interference 1 case

ca-45b-4-11-2022 PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH Mohd Noor Bin Ab Manap
18 August 2025

classification of document Order 34 Rule 2(2) — fraudulent misrepresentation — the Plaintiffs have proven the existence of fraudulent misrepresentation, and it is now, therefore, on the Defendant's shoulders to prove otherwise — appeal dismissed. 1 case

ba-12bncvc-43-07-2024 Lim Yeow Hon v 1. ) Chu Voon Khar 2. ) Wang Lup Meng 3. ) Low Jian Shin 4. ) Lim Derk Leon 5. ) Oon Min Chuan
30 June 2025

case was struck out due to failure to attend court on trial date — applied to reinstate — SCJ dismissed it — no application to set aside the order of the SCJ — Appellant has failed to provide any reasonable and convincing justification for his absence on the trial date that warrants the exercise of the Court's discretion in his favour — Appellant actually refused to attend the trial because he had not filed a witness statement and was unprepared to testify in Court as a witness in this case, rather than due to a mistaken date that is unsupported by any evidence — Appeal dismissed. 1 case

ba-12ancvc-63-11-2024 EDWIN TEOH JIT SIONG v PLENTIFIELD MARKETING SDN.BHD.
17 June 2025

Defamation — Whether the impugned words are defamatory or capable of bearing the pleaded defamatory imputations — Whether the ordinary reasonable person was likely to understand the impugned words in a defamatory way, under the circumstances in which the impugned words were published — Defence of Justification and fair comment 1 case

ba-12bcy-7-10-2024 DATIN PADUKA CHE ASMAH IBRAHIM v Kamarul Zaman Bin Haji Yusoff
24 April 2025

Meter tampering liability — Failure to change account holder name — Breach of obligation to do so in sale and purchase agreement — Whether vendor has the right of indemnity from purchaser to TNB claim for unrecorded electricity after completion of sale — Implied indemnity 1 case

ba-12bncvc-65-10-2024 LAW SONG TING v 1. ) TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD 2. ) HLK (CHAIN-STORE) ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES SDN BHD 3. ) AFFINITY DESIGNS SDN BHD
6 April 2025

Key Statutes

Rules of Court 2012
cited in 11 cases
Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
cited in 4 cases
Limitation Act 1953 (Cap 254)
cited in 3 cases
Subordinate Courts Act 1948 (Cap 92)
cited in 3 cases
Strata Titles Act 1985 (Cap 318)
cited in 2 cases
Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)
cited in 2 cases
Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
cited in 2 cases
HP Act
cited in 1 case
Defamation Act 1957
cited in 1 case
Contract Act
cited in 1 case
Weights and Measures Act 1972
cited in 1 case
Rules of Court 1980
cited in 1 case
Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 (Cap 118)
cited in 1 case
Federal Constitution
cited in 1 case
Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

MYHC 41 MYCOA 5 MYFC 1

Key People & Firms

Top Judges

Noor Hayati binti Haji Mat 7 Raja Segaran a/l S.krishnan 7 Elaine Yap Chin Gaik 6 Moh Kok Wai 5 Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya 4 S. Nantha Balan a/l E.s. Moorthy 3 Mahazan binti Mat Taib 3 Ahmad Kamal bin Md. Shahid 2 Azman bin Abdullah 2 Asmah binti Musa 2 Azahar bin Mohamed 1 Zaharah binti Ibrahim 1 Balia Yusof bin Haji Wahi 1 Seri Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin 1 Prasad Sandosham Abraham 1

Top Firms

Andrew Davis & Co. 4 Othman Hashim & Co 3 Yeoh Shim Siow & Lay Kuan 3 Ching, Tan & Associates 2 Lee & Poh Partnership 2 Wee Choo Keong & Faaiz 2 Kenth Partnership 2 G.K. Sritharan & Co 2 Kee Sern, Siu & Huey 1 Leong Yeng Kit & Co. 1 Ling & Tan Law Chambers 1 Gavin Jajapal 1 Ong Siew Ming & Associates 1 Amritpal Singh 1 Marcus Tan & Co. 1

Top Lawyers

Zaitul Naziah binti Mohd Soib 4 Wong Renn Xin 3 Eugene Khoo Yean Shern 3 Kum Hui Min 3 Hong Shu Han 3 K. L. Wong 2 Wee Choo Keong 2 Yeo Wei Min 2 Gurmel Singh A/L Jit Singh 2 P. Rajagunaseelan 2 Dato' Cyrus Das 1 Lau Kee Sern 1 Leong Xin Wen 1 Harjinder Singh a/l Saudagar Singh 1 Leong Yeng Kong 1

Cases

Page 1 of 2
ma-12bncvc-1-02-2026
LIM KEEM KOK & SONS REALTY SDN. BHD. v TENAGA NASIONAL BERHAD
8 July 2026
MYHC
ma-12bncc-3-09-2025
1. ) BOULEVARD ONE SDN BHD 2. ) BOULEVARD EXCEL SDN BHD v 1. ) VOCATION EMPIRE 2. ) MOHD SABRI BIN ABDUL RASHID 3. ) LINDA YATI BINTI ABU BAKAR
5 July 2026
MYHC
ma-12bncvc-9-12-2025
ALM HOSPITALITY SDN BHD v BEST SUN TECH ENGINEERING SDN BHD
24 June 2026
MYHC
ma-12bncc-1-01-2026
NG SOO SUAN v DANIEL TAN SOO LEONG
18 June 2026
MYHC
ma-12gs-1-10-2025
1. ) SURIA MEKAR SDN. BHD. 2. ) MOHD YAAKOP BIN MOHD DAUD 3. ) NOR FARIZAN BINTI MOHD DAUD v Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia (KDRM)
17 June 2026
MYHC
wa-11ancvc-53-11-2025
MISC BERHAD (dahulunya dikenali sebagai Malaysia International Shipping Corporation Berhad) v SYAHRIDZ BIN DZULKEFLI
4 June 2026
MYHC
ma-12bncvc-11-12-2025
SAMUDERA WIBAWA SDN BHD v PRUDENCE ENERGY SDN BHD
20 May 2026
MYHC
ma-22ncc-9-05-2024
BAHARUDIN BIN ABDUL LATIP v 1. ) PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD 2. ) PRUDENTIAL BSN TAKAFUL BERHAD
20 May 2026
MYHC
wa-12ancvc-163-11-2025
Komala Naidu a/p Purushothaman v KANAGARAJ NAIDU A/L PURUSHOTHAMAN
13 May 2026
MYHC
wa-12bncvc-133-11-2025
PROVEN RELIANCE MANAGEMENT SDN. BHD. v Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (USIM)
11 May 2026
MYHC
ja-12b-37-06-2025
1. ) RAJINA A/P WILLIAM adalah isteri yang sah kepada THANABAL A/L THANGARAJOO simati dan membawa tindakan ini untuk dirinya dan juga bagi pihak estate simati di bawah Seksyen 7 & 8 Akta Undang-Undang Sibil 1956 dan juga bagi gantirugi berifmen 2. ) XXXX v WANG KANG WEI
20 April 2026
MYHC
ba-12bncvc-62-10-2024
1. ) FORESTRY ASSETS SDN. BHD. 2. ) ESHMAEL RAO SOOSAY DASS v 1. ) ROSMA AIDA BINTI RAMELI 2. ) LEE CHIH CHIANG
8 April 2026
MYHC
ba-12b-7-01-2024
MOHAMMAD FIRDAUS BIN AHMAD HUSSIN v SHANMUGAM A/L KANDASAMY
9 March 2026
MYHC
ba-12b-104-10-2025
1. ) FAIZATUL HASANAH BINTI HUSSAIN 2. ) MOHD AZHAR BIN MOHD KHALID v FAUZIAH BINTI HUSSAIN
4 March 2026
MYHC
wa-24ncvc-5126-10-2025
BANURI BIN SIMOK v CHIN MUN FUN
4 March 2026
MYHC
wa-12ancvc-212-12-2024
XTREME MERIDIAN SDN BHD v 1. ) CHOW CHEE WAH 2. ) MOHD DHIYAUDDIN ASSIDDIQ BIN MOHD ZAID 3. ) WILLIAM TEH YEW HOUNG 4. ) DENISE TEOH SHYN YONG
26 February 2026
MYHC
wa-12ancvc-214-12-2024
XTREME MERIDIAN SDN BHD v 1. ) CHOW CHEE WAH 2. ) MOHD DHIYAUDDIN ASSIDDIQ BIN MOHD ZAID 3. ) WILLIAM TEH YEW HOUNG 4. ) DENISE TEOH SHYN YONG
26 February 2026
MYHC
wa-12ancvc-41-04-2025
XTREME MERIDIAN SDN BHD v 1. ) CHOW CHEE WAH 2. ) MOHD DHIYAUDDIN ASSIDDIQ BIN MOHD ZAID 3. ) WILLIAM TEH YEW HOUNG 4. ) DENISE TEOH SHYN YONG
26 February 2026
MYHC
ta-12bncvc-3-06-2025
MANAF BIN BEDO v LADANG RAKYAT TRENGGANU SDN BHD
27 January 2026
MYHC
wa-11bncvc-26-06-2025
BADAN PENGURUSAN BERSAMA TAMAN BELIMBING PERDANA v SANI-MAP DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD
7 January 2026
MYHC
ba-12ancvc-59-11-2024
ARMANEE CONDOMINIUM JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY v BURGESS RAWSON MANAGEMENT SDN BHD
21 August 2025
MYHC
ba-12ancc-25-11-2024
PAUL RAJ A/L DAVIS v MERCEDES-BENZ SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN. BHD.
18 August 2025
MYHC
ca-45b-4-11-2022
PENDAKWA RAYA Pendakwa Raya TERTUDUH Mohd Noor Bin Ab Manap
18 August 2025
MYHC
j-03im-53-07-2023
Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja v HAI KIONG NIANG PIHAK KETIGA Jabatan Insolvensi Malaysia
10 July 2025
MYCOA
j-03im-57-08-2023
Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja v HAI CHIA LING
10 July 2025
MYCOA