CIVIL PROCEDURE: Contempt of Court
3 cases · October 2024 to July 2025
Case Volume by Year
1 24
2 25
2024–2025
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Committal proceedings — Allegation that the alleged contemnors provided information to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (“MACC”) in breach of an undertaking in an Anton Piller order — Whether the alleged contemnors directed a report to be lodged to the MACC — Whether information obtained from the execution of the Anton Piller order was used for the report — Whether the allegation of breach of the undertaking has been proven beyond reasonable doubt 1 Breach of court order — Prima facie contempt of court established and upheld on appeal — Whether contemnor interfered with administration of justice — Whether charge of contempt against contemnors proved beyond reasonable doubt — Whether must show means of contemnor — Whether custodial sentence appropriate 1 Leave to commence committal proceedings — Whether prima facie case of contempt established — Whether penal notice mandatory prerequisite for committal proceedings — Whether interference with permissive court order amounts to contempt — Whether regulatory body's advice on compliance with existing seizure order constitutes contempt 1
Committal proceedings — Allegation that the alleged contemnors provided information to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (“MACC”) in breach of an undertaking in an Anton Piller order — Whether the alleged contemnors directed a report to be lodged to the MACC — Whether information obtained from the execution of the Anton Piller order was used for the report — Whether the allegation of breach of the undertaking has been proven beyond reasonable doubt 1 case
Breach of court order — Prima facie contempt of court established and upheld on appeal — Whether contemnor interfered with administration of justice — Whether charge of contempt against contemnors proved beyond reasonable doubt — Whether must show means of contemnor — Whether custodial sentence appropriate 1 case
Leave to commence committal proceedings — Whether prima facie case of contempt established — Whether penal notice mandatory prerequisite for committal proceedings — Whether interference with permissive court order amounts to contempt — Whether regulatory body's advice on compliance with existing seizure order constitutes contempt 1 case
Key Statutes
Rules of Court 2012
cited in 2 cases Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Cases
wa-22ip-42-07-2020
1. ) OAG ENGINEERING SDN. BHD. 2. ) OAG OFFSHORE PIPELINE SERVICES SDN. BHD. 3. ) OAG INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE SERVICES LTD. ABU DHABI 4. ) OAG INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE SERVICES LTD. 5. ) SETIA OFFSHORE SERVICES SDN. BHD. v 1. ) Ng Hoe Keong 2. ) Devandran A/l Arumugam 3. ) SUN MARINE COATING (M) SDN. BHD. 4. ) Syahirah Binti Saharudin 5. ) Thevagar A/l Gurunathan PIHAK TERKILAN HAFIZAH BINTI ABU HASSAN
27 July 2025
MYHC
wa-17d-47-11-2016
Manoharan A/l Kandasamy v 1. ) XXXX 2. ) Pentadbir Harta Pusaka Lim Kian Peet, (Simati) 3. ) Chong Chuan Long
13 July 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-171-05-2020
Suruhanjaya Sekuriti Malaysia v 1. ) WONG SHEE KAI 2. ) TEH SEW WAN 3. ) WONG SK HOLDINGS SDN. BHD. PENCELAH Suruhanjaya Sekuriti Malaysia
8 October 2024
MYHC