CIVIL PROCEDURE: Mareva Injunction
3 cases · December 2024 to April 2026
Case Volume by Year
1 24
1 25
1 26
2024–2026
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Whether elements of a Mareva Injunction fulfilled — Whether the Plaintiff has a good arguable case — Whether the Defendants have assets within the jurisdiction — Whether there is a real risk of dissipation of assets — Dishonest conduct by Defendants — Defendants' non-performance — Whether private caveat negates risk of dissipation — Mareva Injunction ordered 1 Whether elements of a Mareva Injunction fulfilled — Whether the Plaintiffs have a good arguable case — Whether the Defendant has assets within the jurisdiction — Whether there is a real risk of dissipation of assets — Evidence of Defendant's lack of probity — Sufficiency of Plaintiffs’ undertaking as to damages — Mareva Injunction granted 1 Application for Mareva injunction — Setting aside of ex parte Mareva injunction — Threshold requirements for granting Mareva injunction — Whether plaintiff established good arguable case — Whether plaintiff established real risk of dissipation of assets — Whether full and frank disclosure made at ex parte hearing — Duty of disclosure at ex parte applications 1
Whether elements of a Mareva Injunction fulfilled — Whether the Plaintiff has a good arguable case — Whether the Defendants have assets within the jurisdiction — Whether there is a real risk of dissipation of assets — Dishonest conduct by Defendants — Defendants' non-performance — Whether private caveat negates risk of dissipation — Mareva Injunction ordered 1 case
Whether elements of a Mareva Injunction fulfilled — Whether the Plaintiffs have a good arguable case — Whether the Defendant has assets within the jurisdiction — Whether there is a real risk of dissipation of assets — Evidence of Defendant's lack of probity — Sufficiency of Plaintiffs’ undertaking as to damages — Mareva Injunction granted 1 case
Application for Mareva injunction — Setting aside of ex parte Mareva injunction — Threshold requirements for granting Mareva injunction — Whether plaintiff established good arguable case — Whether plaintiff established real risk of dissipation of assets — Whether full and frank disclosure made at ex parte hearing — Duty of disclosure at ex parte applications 1 case
Key Statutes
Rules of Court 2012
cited in 2 cases National Land Code (Cap 828)
cited in 1 case Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Top Firms
Top Lawyers
Nursyibra Salma Binti Che Rahim 1 Lim Jun Yik 1 Johan Mohan Bin Abdullah 1 Dato' Ambiga Sreenevasan 1 Harjinder Kaur A/P Ajaib Singh 1 Toh Xin Yi 1 Athari bin Bahardin 1 Satharuban Sivasubramaniam 1 Mishalini a/p Rajasegaran 1 Shireen Ann Selvaratnam 1 Siti Mafuza Binti Ahmad Walat 1 Nornadia binti Muri 1 Kenneth Koh 1 Sahain Nada Puthucheary 1 Syamsul Azhar Ab. Aziz 1
Cases
wa-22ncc-341-05-2025
PRIMUS EQUITIES & ASSETS SDN. BHD. v 1. ) LANGKASUKA LAND SDN. BHD. 2. ) WIDAD BUSINESS GROUP SDN. BHD. 3. ) TAN SRI MUHAMMAD IKMAL OPAT BIN ABDULLAH 4. ) ILHAM WIDAD BIN MUHAMMAD IKMAL OPAT 5. ) JAMILAH BINTI MAHAMAD ISA 6. ) Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Langkawi PENCELAH 1. ) Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial (PERKESO) 2. ) OCBC BANK (MALAYSIA) BERHAD
15 April 2026
MYHC
wa-22ncc-219-04-2025
1. ) YONG YEH FONG 2. ) CHAN KWANG HAU 3. ) KEE JOO EE 4. ) TEE WEI KANG 5. ) FOO KHAR YI 6. ) CHONG SIAU XIAN 7. ) HONG TEIN HWEE 8. ) TAN ZHENG HAO 9. ) KELVIN TING CHENG TAT 10. ) YANG WEN BIN 11. ) LIEW PUA KANG 12. ) CHEN XIAO HUI 13. ) SOO CHING GUAN 14. ) NG KUAN YEONG 15. ) KANNY CHAN WEE SIONG 16. ) ELILIA SEOW 17. ) TEOH JIE SHENG 18. ) LOI WEI LUN 19. ) LIM JIN HOWE 20. ) HON FANG TING 21. ) HON JING KANG 22. ) HON SHUN XIN v WILLIAM CHEONG WAI LUN
15 December 2025
MYHC
wa-22ncc-503-07-2024
Lee Rodger Meiklejohn v 1. ) Ranjeet Singh Sidhu 2. ) Tan Sri Syed Mohd Yusof Bin Tun Syed Nasir 3. ) Gurmeet Kaur A/P Gurcharan Singh 4. ) G&P Solutions Sdn Bhd 5. ) Rothchilds Capital (I) Sdn Bhd 6. ) G&P Resources Sdn. Bhd. 7. ) Manibalan Kutty A/L Ragavan 8. ) Satpal Singh A/L Jegir Singh
5 December 2024
MYHC