Committal proceedings
4 cases · March 2022 to April 2026
Case Volume by Year
1 22
1 23
1 25
1 26
2022–2026
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt — allegations of perjury — introducing new evidence through Committal Proceedings. 1 Whether the members of the management committee of the defendant (management corporation) had breached a court order — The court order compels the defendant to strictly enforce the house rules and the by-laws — By prohibiting the residents from parking their vehicles on the common property — Whether personal service of the court order and the committal papers is required — Whether service on defendant’s former solicitors suffice — Whether the penal notice is defective. 1 Setting Aside Ex Parte Leave Order — Order 42 Rule 13 Rules of Court 2012 — Order 52 Rule 3(2) — Expert Evidence — Order 40A Rule 3 — Non-compliance with procedural requirements — Full and frank disclosure — Prima facie case — Fabricated evidence allegations — Technical matters requiring trial — Subsequent trial findings cannot cure defects — Academic nature of proceedings — Wee Choo Keong principle — Contempt must be purged before matter can proceed/trial — Procedural integrity — Temporal disconnect in evidence — Committal Ex parte leave applications requiring strict compliance 1 non-compliance of money judgment — proceedings under section 360 Capital Markets and Service Act 2004 against a bankrupt — leave pursuant to 5.8 (1) Bankruptcy Act 1967 1
standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt — allegations of perjury — introducing new evidence through Committal Proceedings. 1 case
Whether the members of the management committee of the defendant (management corporation) had breached a court order — The court order compels the defendant to strictly enforce the house rules and the by-laws — By prohibiting the residents from parking their vehicles on the common property — Whether personal service of the court order and the committal papers is required — Whether service on defendant’s former solicitors suffice — Whether the penal notice is defective. 1 case
Setting Aside Ex Parte Leave Order — Order 42 Rule 13 Rules of Court 2012 — Order 52 Rule 3(2) — Expert Evidence — Order 40A Rule 3 — Non-compliance with procedural requirements — Full and frank disclosure — Prima facie case — Fabricated evidence allegations — Technical matters requiring trial — Subsequent trial findings cannot cure defects — Academic nature of proceedings — Wee Choo Keong principle — Contempt must be purged before matter can proceed/trial — Procedural integrity — Temporal disconnect in evidence — Committal Ex parte leave applications requiring strict compliance 1 case
non-compliance of money judgment — proceedings under section 360 Capital Markets and Service Act 2004 against a bankrupt — leave pursuant to 5.8 (1) Bankruptcy Act 1967 1 case
Key Statutes
Rules of Court 2012
cited in 1 case Penal Code (Cap 574)
cited in 1 case Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Top Judges
Cases
ba-33-339-07-2021
DR AHRUNAGIRY S/O KARUPPAN CHETTIAR v 1. ) SANTHI @KANNAMMAI D/O MOHAN 2. ) SETHURAMAN S/O MUTHUKARUPPAN
16 April 2026
MYHC
pa-24ncvc-215-02-2024
1. ) SAW GIM TEONG 2. ) PHOO MEI QUEEN v PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN THE RESIDENCE - TAMAN CENGKEH INDAH
17 June 2025
MYHC
22ncc-200-06-2014
1. ) TAN HAN KWAN 2. ) TAN MEI LI 3. ) TAN SU LI v 1. ) BLUEFIRE DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD 2. ) CH'NG KONG SAN
14 June 2023
MYHC
02-122-10-2017w
1. ) Tengku Dato' Kamal Ibni Sir Sultan Abu Bakar 2. ) Lt. Kol. Tengku Dato' Kamarul Zaman Ibni Almarhum Sultan Sir Abu Bakar 3. ) Abdul Rahim Bin Sendiri v Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad
31 March 2022
MYFC