Constitutional law
25 cases · September 2018 to May 2026
Case Volume by Year
1 18
5 19
2 20
1 22
1 23
1 24
5 25
9 26
2018–2026
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Federal Constitution — Articles 5(1), 8(1) and 8(2) Fundamental liberties — Life and personal liberty — Human dignity — Equal protection of the law — Whether it is in violation of medical ethics for medical officer to be participate in the execution of whipping. 3 Equality before the law — Article 8 of Federal Constitution — Tort damages — Denial of bionic prosthesis based on plaintiff’s village lifestyle and former occupation as car washer — Held to be a form of socio‑economic discrimination — No place in law of tort. 1 Freedom of religion — Civil Court jurisdiction — Distinction between ab initio claim and renunciation of Islam — Whether Civil Court had jurisdiction to determine whether Plaintiff ever fell within constitutional category of “persons professing the religion of Islam” — Federal Constitution arts 11(1), 12(4), 121(1A), Ninth Schedule List II Item 1 1 Syariah jurisdiction — Whether acceptance of Plaintiff’s argument would collapse distinction between ab initio claims and renunciation claims under Rosliza and Lina Joy 1 Minor — Religion — Article 12(4) Federal Constitution — Determination of religion — Biological parentage — Administrative classification of religion — 1 Public Prosecutor — Prosecutorial discretion — Power to institute, conduct or discontinue criminal proceedings — Federal Constitution art 145(3) 1 Prosecutorial discretion — Judicial review — Scope of review — Presumption of legality — Requirement of compelling prima facie evidence — Sundra Rajoo a/l Nadarajah v Menteri Luar Negeri, Malaysia & Ors [2021] 5 MLJ 209 1 Right to property — Adequate compensation — Article 13(2) of Federal Constitution — Whether deprivation of property occurred — Plaintiff had voluntarily agreed to surrender land — No entitlement to constitutional protection for property already committed to State 1 Public Prosecutor’s discretion — Scope and limits — Whether discretion unfettered — Application of Art 145(3) Federal Constitution — Whether prosecution acted irrationally, mala fide or oppressively — Effect of Sundra Rajoo decision 1 Article 5(1) — Right to life and personal liberty — Whether repeated reprosecution after DNAA violates constitutional fairness — Criminal Procedure Code as “law” under Art 5(1) 1 Article 8(2) of the Federal Constitution — Discrimination — Provision applies to public law and administration by a public authority — Not applicable to disputes arising from private commercial contracts voluntarily entered into by parties. 1 Citizenship by operation of law — Illegitimate child — Whether an illegitimate child at the time of birth qualifies for citizenship by operation of law — Federal Constitution, Art 14(1)(b). 1 Citizenship — Citizenship by operation of law — Article 14(1)(b) Federal Constitution — Part II Second Schedule ss 1(a), 1(e), 2(3) — Requirement of jus soli and jus sanguinis — Whether proof of both required — Illegitimate child — Whether citizenship follows biological father or mother — Interpretation of “parents” under s 17 Second Schedule — Whether child born in Malaysia but to non-citizen mother entitled to citizenship — Whether child stateless — Binding effect of Federal Court decision — Appeal dismissed 1 Citizenship — Illegitimate child — Section 17 Second Schedule Federal Constitution — “Parents” construed as mother — Jus sanguinis traced to biological mother — Whether child born to foreign mother acquires foreign citizenship at birth — Burden of proof — Whether plaintiffs proved child not a citizen of any country — Failure to prove — Citizenship claim rejected 1 Citizenship — Article 14(1)(b) read with s 1(e) Second Schedule — Phrase “not born a citizen of any country” — Whether imports jus sanguinis requirement — Necessity to prove lineage at time of birth — Whether child capable of acquiring Cambodian citizenship — No statelessness — Claim fails 1 Citizenship — Article 14(1)(b) read with s 1(a) Second Schedule — Requirement that one parent be citizen or permanent resident — Illegitimate child — Whether biological father can be relied upon — Section 17 applies — “Parent” refers to mother — Requirement not satisfied — No entitlement to citizenship 1 Article 10(1)(b) Federal Constitution — Right to peaceful assembly — Article 10(2)(b) FC — Parliamentary restrictions on assembly rights — Article 8(1) FC — Equality before the law & proportionality — Article 4(1) FC — Void laws inconsistent with the Constitution — Peaceful assembly — Notification of assembly — Requirement of giving ten days’ notice to police — Organiser failed to give police ten days’ notice — Whether requirement to give notice reasonable — Whether non-compliance to give required notice detrimental to organiser — Whether in breach of safeguarding provisions — Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 s 9(1) & (5) 1 Jurisdiction — Whether civil court or Syariah Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine application for declaration of a person’s identity. Whether ab initio or renunciation case — Whether identity card — proof of a person’s religion. Federal Constitution — Article 121(1A) — Syariah Court (Perak) Enactment — s.17(2)(b)(xiv) — Administration of the Religion of Islam (Perak) Enactment 2004 — s. 2 — Rules of Court 2012 — O. 53 — Specific Relief Act 1950 — s. 41 1 Citizenship — Application for declaration of citizenship by operation of law — Federal Constitution art. 14(1)(b), Second Schedule Part II para. 1(a) & (e) — Plaintiff born in Malaysia to Indonesian parents — Parents not citizens or permanent residents — Whether Plaintiff “not born a citizen of any country” — Concept of jus soli and jus sanguinis — Statelessness — – Nature of citizenship by naturalisation — Not a birthright — Application must be made to Federal Government — Whether court has jurisdiction to confer citizenship — Separation of powers — Interpretation of Constitution — Interpretation of para. 1(e) Part II Second Schedule — Authorities considered: CTEB & Anor v Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran Negara, Malaysia & Ors [2021] 6 CLJ 471; Pendaftar Besar Kelahiran dan Kematian, Malaysia v Pang Wee See & Anor [2017] 7 CLJ 33; Than Siew Beng & Anor v Ketua Pengarah Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara & Ors [2017] 8 CLJ 16 — Court cannot usurp executive powers — Application for naturalisation must be made to Federal Government — Abuse of process — Originating Summons dismissed. 1 Citizenship by operation of law — Citizenship by operation of law by virtue of s 1(a) of Part II read together with s 19B of Part III of Second Schedule of Federal Constitution — Child born in hospital in Malaysia — Identity of birth mother unknown — Malaysian citizen couple adopted abandoned child — Birth certificate stated child as non-citizen —‘Any newborn child found exposed in any place’ — Whether child entitled to citizenship by operation of law — Federal Constitution Second Schedule, Part III, s 19B 1
+ 10 more
Federal Constitution — Articles 5(1), 8(1) and 8(2) Fundamental liberties — Life and personal liberty — Human dignity — Equal protection of the law — Whether it is in violation of medical ethics for medical officer to be participate in the execution of whipping. 3 cases
05rj-6-11-2024c SIVACHANDRAN A/L S JAYARAJAH v Pendakwa Raya
21 April 2026
07-23-11-2024w MOHD HELMI ANUAR BIN MOHD KASSIM v Pendakwa Raya PEGUAM PEMERHATI Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM) AMICUS CURIAE Collin Arvind Andrew
21 April 2026
07-24-11-2024w KUMANAAN A/L ANTHONY VINCENT v Pendakwa Raya PEGUAM PEMERHATI Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia (SUHAKAM) AMICUS CURIAE Collin Arvind Andrew
21 April 2026
Equality before the law — Article 8 of Federal Constitution — Tort damages — Denial of bionic prosthesis based on plaintiff’s village lifestyle and former occupation as car washer — Held to be a form of socio‑economic discrimination — No place in law of tort. 1 case
Freedom of religion — Civil Court jurisdiction — Distinction between ab initio claim and renunciation of Islam — Whether Civil Court had jurisdiction to determine whether Plaintiff ever fell within constitutional category of “persons professing the religion of Islam” — Federal Constitution arts 11(1), 12(4), 121(1A), Ninth Schedule List II Item 1 1 case
Syariah jurisdiction — Whether acceptance of Plaintiff’s argument would collapse distinction between ab initio claims and renunciation claims under Rosliza and Lina Joy 1 case
Minor — Religion — Article 12(4) Federal Constitution — Determination of religion — Biological parentage — Administrative classification of religion — 1 case
Public Prosecutor — Prosecutorial discretion — Power to institute, conduct or discontinue criminal proceedings — Federal Constitution art 145(3) 1 case
Prosecutorial discretion — Judicial review — Scope of review — Presumption of legality — Requirement of compelling prima facie evidence — Sundra Rajoo a/l Nadarajah v Menteri Luar Negeri, Malaysia & Ors [2021] 5 MLJ 209 1 case
Right to property — Adequate compensation — Article 13(2) of Federal Constitution — Whether deprivation of property occurred — Plaintiff had voluntarily agreed to surrender land — No entitlement to constitutional protection for property already committed to State 1 case
Public Prosecutor’s discretion — Scope and limits — Whether discretion unfettered — Application of Art 145(3) Federal Constitution — Whether prosecution acted irrationally, mala fide or oppressively — Effect of Sundra Rajoo decision 1 case
Article 5(1) — Right to life and personal liberty — Whether repeated reprosecution after DNAA violates constitutional fairness — Criminal Procedure Code as “law” under Art 5(1) 1 case
Citizenship by operation of law — Illegitimate child — Whether an illegitimate child at the time of birth qualifies for citizenship by operation of law — Federal Constitution, Art 14(1)(b). 1 case
Citizenship — Citizenship by operation of law — Article 14(1)(b) Federal Constitution — Part II Second Schedule ss 1(a), 1(e), 2(3) — Requirement of jus soli and jus sanguinis — Whether proof of both required — Illegitimate child — Whether citizenship follows biological father or mother — Interpretation of “parents” under s 17 Second Schedule — Whether child born in Malaysia but to non-citizen mother entitled to citizenship — Whether child stateless — Binding effect of Federal Court decision — Appeal dismissed 1 case
Citizenship — Illegitimate child — Section 17 Second Schedule Federal Constitution — “Parents” construed as mother — Jus sanguinis traced to biological mother — Whether child born to foreign mother acquires foreign citizenship at birth — Burden of proof — Whether plaintiffs proved child not a citizen of any country — Failure to prove — Citizenship claim rejected 1 case
Citizenship — Article 14(1)(b) read with s 1(e) Second Schedule — Phrase “not born a citizen of any country” — Whether imports jus sanguinis requirement — Necessity to prove lineage at time of birth — Whether child capable of acquiring Cambodian citizenship — No statelessness — Claim fails 1 case
Citizenship — Article 14(1)(b) read with s 1(a) Second Schedule — Requirement that one parent be citizen or permanent resident — Illegitimate child — Whether biological father can be relied upon — Section 17 applies — “Parent” refers to mother — Requirement not satisfied — No entitlement to citizenship 1 case
Article 10(1)(b) Federal Constitution — Right to peaceful assembly — Article 10(2)(b) FC — Parliamentary restrictions on assembly rights — Article 8(1) FC — Equality before the law & proportionality — Article 4(1) FC — Void laws inconsistent with the Constitution — Peaceful assembly — Notification of assembly — Requirement of giving ten days’ notice to police — Organiser failed to give police ten days’ notice — Whether requirement to give notice reasonable — Whether non-compliance to give required notice detrimental to organiser — Whether in breach of safeguarding provisions — Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 s 9(1) & (5) 1 case
Jurisdiction — Whether civil court or Syariah Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine application for declaration of a person’s identity. Whether ab initio or renunciation case — Whether identity card — proof of a person’s religion. Federal Constitution — Article 121(1A) — Syariah Court (Perak) Enactment — s.17(2)(b)(xiv) — Administration of the Religion of Islam (Perak) Enactment 2004 — s. 2 — Rules of Court 2012 — O. 53 — Specific Relief Act 1950 — s. 41 1 case
Citizenship by operation of law — Citizenship by operation of law by virtue of s 1(a) of Part II read together with s 19B of Part III of Second Schedule of Federal Constitution — Child born in hospital in Malaysia — Identity of birth mother unknown — Malaysian citizen couple adopted abandoned child — Birth certificate stated child as non-citizen —‘Any newborn child found exposed in any place’ — Whether child entitled to citizenship by operation of law — Federal Constitution Second Schedule, Part III, s 19B 1 case
Citizenship by operation of law — Citizenship by operation of law by virtue of s 1(e) read together with s 2(3) of the Second Schedule of the Federal Constitution — “Not born a citizen of any country” — Meaning 1 case
Legislation — validity of legislation — whether Parliament has power and/or competent to enact any provisions that regulates matters relating to Islamic Medicine and Malay Traditional Medicine — sections 25 and 26 of the Act — Islamic Medicine and Malay Traditional Medicine (ACT 775) — Challenge Based On Article 38(4) Of The Federal Constitution — The Doctrine Of Pith And Substance - 1 case
the validity of impugned legislation — the sentence of mandatory death penalty for trafficking under section 39B of the Dangerous Drugs Act and section 302 of the Penal Code for murder — Whether the said provisions were unconstitutional — Whether the said provisions can be struck down for violating Articles 5(1), 8(1) and 121 of the Federal Constitution — Whether death penalty is the proportionate punishment for the offence — Whether alternative punishments should be made available and the Court be given discretion to impose suitable punishment — Whether the Court should simply implement punishment prescribed by Parliament without question 1 case
Legislature — Whether Section 28 of the Syariah Criminal Offences (Selangor) Enactment 1995 (‘s 28’) enacted by Selangor State Legislature had legislated a matter in the Federal List in Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constitution — Item 4(h) of the Federal List — Section 377A of the Penal Code — Whether applicant ought to be granted leave pursuant to Article 4(4) of the Federal Constitution in challenging the constitutionality of s 28 — Whether applicant has fulfilled the requirements under Article 4(3) for leave to be granted on the ground of lack of competency by Selangor State Legislature to enact s 28 1 case
Gag order — Article 126 FC — S 13 Court Judicature Act — whether Court has jurisdiction to issue gag order — whether court should adopt prismatic construction of A 126 FC and S 13 CJA — whether court should grant gag order when the country has abolished trials by jury — test for gag order — whether appellant had fulfilled the test — whether there is real and substantial risk to the fairness of the trial — whether it is necessary and proportionate to grant gag order 1 case
Article 121 — Islamic banking — Section 57 of CBMA 2009 — ruling of SAC is binding on High Court — whether Section 57 vested judicial power to the Shariah Advisory Council — whether section 57 CBMA is valid and constitutional 1 case
Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009 S 56,57 — Shariah Advisory Council — whether section 56,57 of CBMA breaches Federal Constitution for having the effect of vesting judicial power in the Shariah Advisory Council — whether the provisions violates doctrine of separation of power — whether Parliament can set up a legislative mechanism in relation to Islamic financial business — whether Court is bound to advice by SAC — whether the impugned provision intrudes onto judicial power 1 case
constitutionality of statute — A 5, 8, 121 FC — s 37A Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 — whether the use of double presumptions under s 37A is constitutional — whether insertion of s 37A contravenes the principle of separation of powers — whether s 37A violates Articles 5 & 8 of FC — whether the use of ‘deemed possession’ under s 37(d) of DDA denied the accused of fair trial — presumption of innocence — whether s 37A violates presumption of innocence — whether requirement of the accused to rebut the presumptions violates the presumption of innocence — whether the decision in Muhammed bin Hassan v Public Prosecutor [1998] 2 MLJ 273 remained valid — whether trafficking presumption could only be invoked if trial court had found evidence of possession affirmatively — duty of the court to adopt prismatic approach in interpreting fundamental rights — doctrine of proportionality on statutory presumptions -- whether double presumptions satisfy the requirement of proportionality — whether enactment of s 37A intrudes into judicial power 1 case
Constitutional questions — s 84 of Court Judicature Act 1964 — Whether the appointments of the second respondent and third respondent as Chief Justice of Malaysia and the President Court of Appeal respectively after their mandatory retirements are valid and constitutional — Federal Constitution Article 122,122B,125 — Constitution of Federal Court — Appointment of judges of Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Courts, Tenure of office and remuneration of judges of Federal Court — Position of Conflict — Challenge of bias — Direct interest — Real possibility of bias — Whether the constitutional questions rendered academic — Public Law exception 1 case
Key Statutes
Federal Constitution
cited in 10 cases Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (Cap 234)
cited in 4 cases Penal Code (Cap 574)
cited in 4 cases
cited in 3 cases
Civil Law Act 1956
cited in 3 cases Government Proceedings Act 1956
cited in 2 cases Rules of Court 2012
cited in 2 cases Peaceful Assembly Act 2012
cited in 1 case Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Cap 91)
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)
cited in 1 case Contract Act 1950
cited in 1 case Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
cited in 1 case National Land Code
cited in 1 case Land Acquisition Act 1960 (Cap 486)
cited in 1 case Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Top Judges
Ramly bin Haji Ali 6 Nallini Pathmanathan 5 Azahar bin Mohamed 5 Panglima David Wong Dak Wah 5 Alizatul Khair binti Osman Khairuddin 5 Panglima Richard Malanjum 5 Mohd Zawawi bin Salleh 5 Idrus bin Harun 4 Zaharah binti Ibrahim 4 Azizah binti Haji Nawawi 4 Wan Ahmad Farid bin Wan Salleh 4 Rohana binti Yusuf 3 Abang Iskandar bin Abang Hashim 3 Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat 3 Ahmad bin Haji Maarop 3
Top Firms
Attorney General's Chambers 4 Collin's Law Chambers 3 SP Chanra 3 Daim & Gamany 2 Yeoh Mazlina & Partners 1 Lim Wei Jiet 1 Jeffrey Tan & Chng 1 Shearn Delamore 1 Abhilaash Subramaniam & Co 1 Lee & Poh Partnership 1 Alvin's Chang Chamber 1 Melaka State Legal Advisor Office 1 Azrul, Liew & Co. 1 Mohamed Noor, Amran & Yoon 1 Raj & Sach 1
Top Lawyers
Afzainizam bin Abdul Aziz 3 Athimulan a/l Muruthiah 3 Mohd. Fuad bin Abdul Aziz 3 Collin Arvind Andrew 3 Chanravathane a/p S. Ponnudurai 3 N. Surendran a/l K. Nagarajan 2 Latheefa Beebi Koya 2 Shahid Adli Bin Kamaruddin 2 Yu Ying 2 Mahajoth Singh 2 Dato' Dr Gurdial Singh Nijar 1 Abraham Au Tian Hui 1 New Sin Yew 1 Lim Wei Jiet 1 Nevyn Vinosh Venudran 1
Cases
ta-12b-18-10-2025
MUHAMMAD IRSYAD SYAMIL BIN ABDUL AZIZ v 1. ) AWANG NIZAM BIN JUSOH 2. ) ERDA MARIANI BINTI RUNI
16 May 2026
MYHC
ma-24-5-07-2025
NURISAH BINTI ABDULLAH v 1. ) Majlis Agama Islam Melaka 2. ) Kerajaan Negeri Melaka 3. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA
14 May 2026
MYHC
05rj-6-11-2024c
SIVACHANDRAN A/L S JAYARAJAH v Pendakwa Raya
21 April 2026
MYFC
07-23-11-2024w
MOHD HELMI ANUAR BIN MOHD KASSIM v Pendakwa Raya PEGUAM PEMERHATI Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia Malaysia (SUHAKAM) AMICUS CURIAE Collin Arvind Andrew
21 April 2026
MYFC
07-24-11-2024w
KUMANAAN A/L ANTHONY VINCENT v Pendakwa Raya PEGUAM PEMERHATI Suruhanjaya Hak Asasi Manusia (SUHAKAM) AMICUS CURIAE Collin Arvind Andrew
21 April 2026
MYFC
ma-25-7-09-2025
1. ) XXXX 2. ) LIM KENG YAU 3. ) YAU LEE LEE v KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA
26 March 2026
MYHC
ma-25-9-10-2025
SUNG TIAK KENG v 1. ) Pendakwa Raya [Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM)] 2. ) PEGUAM NEGARA MALAYSIA 3. ) SIANG TIAK HOCK 4. ) KOH KIM HO
12 March 2026
MYHC
ta-24-2-12-2024
ISMAIL BIN MAMAT v 1. ) Pentadbir Tanah Besut 2. ) Kerajaan Negeri Terengganu 3. ) Jabatan Ketua Pengarah Tanah & Galian (JKPTG)
15 February 2026
MYHC
ja-43a-1-01-2026
MOHD NOOR AAZLY BIN YAHYA v Pendakwa Raya
9 February 2026
MYHC
w-01ncvcw-180-03-2024
GULAM WAWASAN SDN BHD v 1. ) Kerajaan Malaysia 2. ) KEMENTERIAN PERUMAHAN DAN KERAJAAN TEMPATAN 3. ) JABATAN PENGURUSAN SISA PEPEJAL NEGARA 4. ) Dato' Sri Haji Mohammad Bin Mentek, Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Perumahan Dan Kerajaan Tempatan 5. ) ISMAIL BIN MOKHTAR, KETUA EKSEKUTIF SOLID WASTE AND PUBLIC CLEANSING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 6. ) SOLID WASTE AND PUBLIC CLEANSING MANAGEMENT CORPOR
20 November 2025
MYCOA
jb-24ncvc-308-06-2024
1. ) LIM YONG KIM 2. ) LEONG SIEW CHAN (P) 3. ) LIM YONG KIM (WAKIL LITIGASI KEPADA LIM WEI QI BELUM DEWASA) v 1. ) Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Dalam Negeri 2. ) PENDAFTAR BESAR KELAHIRAN DAN KEMATIAN JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA MALAYSIA
17 November 2025
MYHC
j-01ncvca-400-06-2024
1. ) LAU LAI LENG 2. ) LAU WEI SIANG (Seorang kanak-kanak yang menuntut melalui Bapa Kandung yang sah di sisi undang-undang dan wakil litigasi, Lau Lai Leng) v 1. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA 2. ) MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia
11 November 2025
MYCOA
06rj-1-08-2024w
AMIR HARIRI BIN ABD HADI v Pendakwa Raya [Jabatan Peguam Negara]
30 June 2025
MYFC
aa-24-7-07-2022
SHIVANISH v 1. ) MAJLIS AGAMA ISLAM DAN ADAT MELAYU PERAK 2. ) Kerajaan Negeri Perak
22 April 2025
MYHC
ja-24ncvc-969-08-2023
IRHAZMI BIN ALI KASIM v 1. ) PENDAFTAR BESAR KELAHIRAN DAN KEMATIAN JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA MALAYSIA 2. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA 3. ) Ketua Setiausaha Menteri Dalam Negeri
1 July 2024
MYHC
wa-24-59-10-2022
1. ) KAM CHOI FOONG 2. ) CHONG AH CHYE v 1. ) KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA 2. ) MENTERI DALAM NEGERI MALAYSIA 3. ) Kerajaan Malaysia
13 November 2023
MYHC
bka-2-11-2021w
RAMLI BIN GHANI v 1. ) KEMENTERIAN KESIHATAN MALAYSIA 2. ) Kerajaan Malaysia PEGUAM PEMERHATI 1. MUHAMAD HISHAM BIN MARZUKI (DARUSSYIFA')
16 March 2022
MYFC
05-76-04-2017-j-05-179-08-2017-b-05-214-09-2017-k-05m-118-05-2018-b
1. ) [05-76-04/2017 (J)] LETITIA BOSMAN 2. ) [05-179-08/2017 (B)] JORGE CRESPO GOMEZ 3. ) [05-214-09/2017 (K)] BENJAMIN WILLIAM HAWKES 4. ) [05(M)-118-05/2018 (B)] PUBALAN S/O PEREMAL v PENDAKWA RAYA
12 August 2020
MYFC
bka-3-11-2019w
Iki Putra bin Mubarrak v Kerajaan Negeri Selangor
13 May 2020
MYFC
05l-76-03-2019-w
Dato'Sri Mohd Najib Bin Hj Abd Razak v Public Prosecutor
9 April 2019
MYFC
06-06-07-2017-b
JRI Resources Sdn Bhd v Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad PENCELAH (1) President of Association of Islamic Banking Institutions Malaysia (2) Central Bank of Malaysia
9 April 2019
MYFC
06i-06-07-2017-b
JRI Resources Sdn Bhd v Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad PENCELAH 1. ) President of Association of Islamic Banking Institutions Malaysia 2. ) Central Bank of Malaysia
9 April 2019
MYFC
06i-06-07-2017b
JRI Resources Sdn Bhd v Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad PENCELAH 1) President of Association of Islamic Banking Institutions Malaysia 2) Central Bank of Malaysia
9 April 2019
MYFC
05-94-05-2017-b
Alma Nudo Atenza v Public Prosecutor
4 April 2019
MYFC
06f-1-01-2018w
Bar Council Malaysia v 1. Tun Dato' Seri Arifin bin Zakaria 2. Tun Md Raus bin Sharif 3. Tan Sri Dato' Seri Zulkefli bin Ahmad Makinudin 4. Kerajaan Malaysia PENCELAH Persatuan Peguam-Peguam Muslim Malaysia
23 September 2018
MYFC