Estoppel

9 cases · May 2025 to June 2026

Case Volume by Year

3
25
6
26
2025–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Representation by management corporation’s officer that only current charges payable — Purchaser relying and making payments accordingly — Acceptance of payments without reservation — Whether management corporation estopped from claiming historical arrears. 1 By conduct — Account stated — Silence in response to invoices and statements of account — Whether defendants estopped from disputing liability after receiving invoices, making part-payments and failing to raise contemporaneous objections — Whether part-payment constituted acknowledgment of indebtedness 1 Approbation and reprobation — Acceptance of benefits — Whether landlords estopped from denying novation by accepting rental payments from third party without protest — Requirement of knowledge, election and unequivocal representation — Whether estoppel issues required trial 1 if all 25 consignments were indeed substandard, it defies logic that the Appellant did not immediately reject or halt subsequent shipments upon discovering the defective quality of the very first consignment — instead, the Appellant continued to accept deliveries without protest, waiting until the 25th and final consignment before raising any objection — in all the circumstances the Appellant is estopped from asserting about the substandard of the goods. 1 Whether purchasers estopped from invoking PJD Regency principle — Effect of admission that SPA terms not challenged — Whether developer may rely on own breach of regulation 11(2) HDR 1989 — Consumer protection policy. 1 Res judicata — Public policy — Finality of litigation — Whether court may decline to apply doctrine where injustice would result 1 Representation — Reliance and detriment — Threshold not met — Boustead Trading applied 1 Waiver by election — Failure to notify and terminate — Whether plaintiff's conduct in terminating facility without notifying defendant estopped subsequent claim under LOU — Whether unequivocal representation made. 1 Is the Plaintiff estopped from filing this suit due to a previous withdrawal? — Plaintiff had the liberty to refile the suit after withdrawal of the earlier claim. 1

Representation by management corporation’s officer that only current charges payable — Purchaser relying and making payments accordingly — Acceptance of payments without reservation — Whether management corporation estopped from claiming historical arrears. 1 case

By conduct — Account stated — Silence in response to invoices and statements of account — Whether defendants estopped from disputing liability after receiving invoices, making part-payments and failing to raise contemporaneous objections — Whether part-payment constituted acknowledgment of indebtedness 1 case

Approbation and reprobation — Acceptance of benefits — Whether landlords estopped from denying novation by accepting rental payments from third party without protest — Requirement of knowledge, election and unequivocal representation — Whether estoppel issues required trial 1 case

if all 25 consignments were indeed substandard, it defies logic that the Appellant did not immediately reject or halt subsequent shipments upon discovering the defective quality of the very first consignment — instead, the Appellant continued to accept deliveries without protest, waiting until the 25th and final consignment before raising any objection — in all the circumstances the Appellant is estopped from asserting about the substandard of the goods. 1 case

Whether purchasers estopped from invoking PJD Regency principle — Effect of admission that SPA terms not challenged — Whether developer may rely on own breach of regulation 11(2) HDR 1989 — Consumer protection policy. 1 case

Res judicata — Public policy — Finality of litigation — Whether court may decline to apply doctrine where injustice would result 1 case

Representation — Reliance and detriment — Threshold not met — Boustead Trading applied 1 case

Waiver by election — Failure to notify and terminate — Whether plaintiff's conduct in terminating facility without notifying defendant estopped subsequent claim under LOU — Whether unequivocal representation made. 1 case

Is the Plaintiff estopped from filing this suit due to a previous withdrawal? — Plaintiff had the liberty to refile the suit after withdrawal of the earlier claim. 1 case

Key Statutes

Rules of Court 2012
cited in 2 cases
Limitation Act
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
Subordinate Courts Act 1948
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
National Land Code
cited in 1 case
Probate and Administration Act 1959
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case
Federal Constitution
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Key People & Firms

Cases