Minority Oppression
6 cases · August 2023 to December 2025
Case Volume by Year
1 23
5 25
2023–2025
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Whether removal from management with shares locked in oppressive — Whether pending suit for misconduct against minority bars oppression action? — Whether sale of shares to new investor terminated quasi partnership on the facts? — Whether valuation expert should subject to cross examination whether original buyout order did not provide for it? 3 to determine whether the Plaintiffs had made out a case under Section 346 of the Companies Act 2016 1 s.346 Companies Act 2016 — Whether company family-owned or quasi-partnership — Threshold issue — Articles contained no family-specific provisions — Professional qualification requirement inconsistent with family ownership — Board-centric governance with majority independent non-family directors — Legitimate expectation of management participation not established — Mere shareholding or family relationship insufficient — Test for oppression: visible departure from fair dealing, burdensome, harsh and wrongful — Commercial unfairness — Distinction between director’s and member’s rights — Removal as director not oppressive where shareholder rights unaffected — Management within Board’s discretion — Inconsistent alternative reliefs undermining credibility — Abuse of process Counterclaim — Distinction between failed and abusive claims. 1 Section 346 Companies Act 2016 — Members' Written Resolution inconsistent with constitution — Article 67 breach — General meeting requirement for director appointment — Article 95 breach — Board appointment of company secretary — Section 302(2)(a) — Resolution rendered ineffective — Section 236 board appointment requirement — Attempted subsequent ratification — Invalid cure of initial breach — Majority shareholder conduct — 60% vs 40% shareholding — Visible departure from fair dealing standards — Pattern of oppressive conduct — Breach of proper procedures — Disregard of minority rights — Collateral purposes — Unlawful appointments — Invalid resolution — Rectification of company records 1
to determine whether the Plaintiffs had made out a case under Section 346 of the Companies Act 2016 1 case
Key Statutes
Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
cited in 5 cases Companies Act
cited in 1 case Court Distribution
Key People & Firms
Top Judges
Top Firms
Cases
ma-24ncc-20-08-2025
1. ) QIN YUE QIANG 2. ) BLUE WHALE TECHNOLOGY (MALAYSIA) SDN. BHD. v 1. ) TAN HUAN KHIANG 2. ) RENGKAS MAJU (M) SDN. BHD. 3. ) RMM PETROCHEM SDN. BHD. 4. ) RMM TECHNOLOGY SDN. BHD.
15 December 2025
MYHC
wa-24ncc-551-12-2021
Trudy Ranjini Ganendra v 1. ) Dato' Dennis Ganendra 2. ) Minconsult Sdn. Bhd. 3. ) Dato Sri Roslan Bin Muhammad Tahar PIHAK TERKILAN Dato Wan Razali Bin Wan Muda
13 July 2025
MYHC
w-02imncc-1631-09-2024
CJ POLYMERS SDN BHD v 1. ) Kerk Han Meng [Notice Of Discontinuance At Encl. 27] 2. ) LEE YU MENG 3. ) KUA CHIN WEE 4. ) Sim Chu Hu
21 April 2025
MYCOA
w-02ncca-2146-11-2022
CJ POLYMERS SDN BHD v 1. ) Kerk Han Meng [Notice Of Discontinuance At Encl. 27] 2. ) Sim Chin Hu [Notice Of Cross Appeal At Encl. 5] 3. ) LEE YU MENG 4. ) KUA CHIN WEE PIHAK TERKILAN TETUAN SHUI-TAI
21 April 2025
MYCOA
w-02ncca-2148-11-2022
1. ) Kerk Han Meng [Notice Of Discontinuance At Encl. 27] 2. ) LEE YU MENG v 1. ) Sim Chin Hu [Notice Of Cross Appeal At Encl. 5] 2. ) KUA CHIN WEE 3. ) CJ POLYMERS SDN BHD
21 April 2025
MYCOA
wa-24ncc-831-08-2022
MAH YUEN SHI v 1. ) WONG KOON HUNG 2. ) WONG KIEN CHOONG 3. ) MAK CHOOI PENG 4. ) MASERA REALTY SDN BHD
22 August 2023
MYHC