res judicata

8 cases · August 2025 to May 2026

Case Volume by Year

4
25
4
26
2025–2026

Key Issues & Sub-Topics

Issue estoppel — Judgment debt — Whether merits of summary judgment could be indirectly reopened in Fortuna injunction proceedings absent stay or setting aside of judgment 1 Issue estoppel — Judgment debt — Whether respondent barred from re-litigating matters already determined in judgment proceedings 1 Issue estoppel — Prior litigation involving different purchaser in same development project — Whether present action materially identical to earlier suit — Whether claims for fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent trading, supported by additional contemporaneous documents, could be said to have been concluded by earlier proceedings — Whether no real or practical difference between issues established on present record 1 it is incumbent upon this court to see whether issues, claims and reliefs in the Suit 2020 are akin to the present suit to determine whether res judicata applies or otherwise 1 Interlocutory order — Stay order not appealed — Whether subsequent application to set aside constitutes re-litigation — Abuse of process — Principle of finality. 1 Whether previous suit involving same parties and subject matter bars current claim — Identity of issues and parties — Whether insurers are privies to insured in earlier suit 1 breached the rule of natural justice — 2ND SET ASIDE THE FINAL AWARD — section 42 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — setting aside Application against an arbitral award can only enquire into the decision-making process of the arbitrator and not the decision in and of itself — section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — Res ipsa of a ‘jurisdictional challenge’ — right to be heard in limine — term “public policy” within section 37 (1)(b)(ii) of the Arbitration Act 2005 — principle of estoppel per rem judicatam (or res judicata) — estoppel 1 Striking out — Plaintiffs memfailkan saman pemula baharu berhubung hak milikan dan injunksi ke atas hartanah yang sama yang telah diputuskan dalam prosiding terdahulu — Isu dan pihak-pihak adalah sama — Tindakan baharu terhalang oleh prinsip res judicata — Litigasi berganda menyalahi prinsip finality of litigation — Mahkamah menegaskan bahawa Aturan 18 r.19(1)(b) & (d) Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 membolehkan pliding dibatalkan jika ia remeh, menyusahkan atau suatu penyalahgunaan proses — Permohonan Defendan dibenarkan, saman pemula dibatalkan dengan kos. 1

Issue estoppel — Judgment debt — Whether merits of summary judgment could be indirectly reopened in Fortuna injunction proceedings absent stay or setting aside of judgment 1 case

Issue estoppel — Judgment debt — Whether respondent barred from re-litigating matters already determined in judgment proceedings 1 case

Issue estoppel — Prior litigation involving different purchaser in same development project — Whether present action materially identical to earlier suit — Whether claims for fraudulent misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation and fraudulent trading, supported by additional contemporaneous documents, could be said to have been concluded by earlier proceedings — Whether no real or practical difference between issues established on present record 1 case

it is incumbent upon this court to see whether issues, claims and reliefs in the Suit 2020 are akin to the present suit to determine whether res judicata applies or otherwise 1 case

Interlocutory order — Stay order not appealed — Whether subsequent application to set aside constitutes re-litigation — Abuse of process — Principle of finality. 1 case

Whether previous suit involving same parties and subject matter bars current claim — Identity of issues and parties — Whether insurers are privies to insured in earlier suit 1 case

breached the rule of natural justice — 2ND SET ASIDE THE FINAL AWARD — section 42 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — setting aside Application against an arbitral award can only enquire into the decision-making process of the arbitrator and not the decision in and of itself — section 37 of the Arbitration Act 2005 — Res ipsa of a ‘jurisdictional challenge’ — right to be heard in limine — term “public policy” within section 37 (1)(b)(ii) of the Arbitration Act 2005 — principle of estoppel per rem judicatam (or res judicata) — estoppel 1 case

Striking out — Plaintiffs memfailkan saman pemula baharu berhubung hak milikan dan injunksi ke atas hartanah yang sama yang telah diputuskan dalam prosiding terdahulu — Isu dan pihak-pihak adalah sama — Tindakan baharu terhalang oleh prinsip res judicata — Litigasi berganda menyalahi prinsip finality of litigation — Mahkamah menegaskan bahawa Aturan 18 r.19(1)(b) & (d) Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 membolehkan pliding dibatalkan jika ia remeh, menyusahkan atau suatu penyalahgunaan proses — Permohonan Defendan dibenarkan, saman pemula dibatalkan dengan kos. 1 case

Key Statutes

cited in 2 cases
English Arbitration Act 1950
cited in 1 case
Insolvency Act 1986
cited in 1 case
Companies Act 2016
cited in 1 case
cited in 1 case

Court Distribution

Key People & Firms

Cases